Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-32862][SS] Left semi stream-stream join #30076
[SPARK-32862][SS] Left semi stream-stream join #30076
Changes from all commits
e5af8e1
ee16690
3918727
765a233
9cd222f
14871d9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes more sense to add this filter logic in the
predicate
param(i.epostJoinFilter
for OneSideHashJoiner) for rightSideJoiner only, corresponding to the comment https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30076/files#diff-6cd66da710d8d54025c1edf658bbec5230e8b4e748f9f2f884a60b1ba1efed42R264There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought this first and not proposed because current predicate cannot check the condition. We can still do this via adjusting the type of predicate a bit, but I guess the followup PR would try to separate left semi case of performance which lets us to can revert the change here. For the reason I prefer the small change for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, after taking a further look, the
joinedRow
already dropped the message ofmatched
, so it's hard to do now. +1 for the change now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33211 for this followup.