[SPARK-40470][SQL] Handle GetArrayStructFields and GetMapValue in "arrays_zip" function #37911
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2022
HyukjinKwon
changed the title
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Merged to master, branch-3.3 and branch-3.2. |
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2022
…rays_zip" function ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up for #37833. The PR fixes column names in `arrays_zip` function for the cases when `GetArrayStructFields` and `GetMapValue` expressions are used (see unit tests for more details). Before the patch, the column names would be indexes or an AnalysisException would be thrown in the case of `GetArrayStructFields` example. ### Why are the changes needed? Fixes an inconsistency issue in Spark 3.2 and onwards where the fields would be labeled as indexes instead of column names. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I added unit tests that reproduce the issue and confirmed that the patch fixes them. Closes #37911 from sadikovi/SPARK-40470. Authored-by: Ivan Sadikov <ivan.sadikov@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 9b0f979) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2022
…rays_zip" function ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up for #37833. The PR fixes column names in `arrays_zip` function for the cases when `GetArrayStructFields` and `GetMapValue` expressions are used (see unit tests for more details). Before the patch, the column names would be indexes or an AnalysisException would be thrown in the case of `GetArrayStructFields` example. ### Why are the changes needed? Fixes an inconsistency issue in Spark 3.2 and onwards where the fields would be labeled as indexes instead of column names. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I added unit tests that reproduce the issue and confirmed that the patch fixes them. Closes #37911 from sadikovi/SPARK-40470. Authored-by: Ivan Sadikov <ivan.sadikov@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 9b0f979) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
|
Thank you, @HyukjinKwon! |
LuciferYang
pushed a commit
to LuciferYang/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2022
…rays_zip" function ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up for apache#37833. The PR fixes column names in `arrays_zip` function for the cases when `GetArrayStructFields` and `GetMapValue` expressions are used (see unit tests for more details). Before the patch, the column names would be indexes or an AnalysisException would be thrown in the case of `GetArrayStructFields` example. ### Why are the changes needed? Fixes an inconsistency issue in Spark 3.2 and onwards where the fields would be labeled as indexes instead of column names. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I added unit tests that reproduce the issue and confirmed that the patch fixes them. Closes apache#37911 from sadikovi/SPARK-40470. Authored-by: Ivan Sadikov <ivan.sadikov@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
sunchao
pushed a commit
to sunchao/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2023
…rays_zip" function ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This is a follow-up for apache#37833. The PR fixes column names in `arrays_zip` function for the cases when `GetArrayStructFields` and `GetMapValue` expressions are used (see unit tests for more details). Before the patch, the column names would be indexes or an AnalysisException would be thrown in the case of `GetArrayStructFields` example. ### Why are the changes needed? Fixes an inconsistency issue in Spark 3.2 and onwards where the fields would be labeled as indexes instead of column names. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I added unit tests that reproduce the issue and confirmed that the patch fixes them. Closes apache#37911 from sadikovi/SPARK-40470. Authored-by: Ivan Sadikov <ivan.sadikov@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 9b0f979) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for #37833.
The PR fixes column names in
arrays_zipfunction for the cases whenGetArrayStructFieldsandGetMapValueexpressions are used (see unit tests for more details).Before the patch, the column names would be indexes or an AnalysisException would be thrown in the case of
GetArrayStructFieldsexample.Why are the changes needed?
Fixes an inconsistency issue in Spark 3.2 and onwards where the fields would be labeled as indexes instead of column names.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
I added unit tests that reproduce the issue and confirmed that the patch fixes them.