[SPARK-40382][SQL][TESTS][FOLLOW-UP] Make the tests pass with ANSI enabled #38250
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HyukjinKwon
changed the title
|
cc @cloud-fan and @bersprockets FYI |
|
seems fine if CI passes |
|
Merged to master. |
|
Thanks, and sorry about that. I will verify any test changes with |
|
No problem. This happens time to time even in my PR :-) |
SandishKumarHN
pushed a commit
to SandishKumarHN/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2022
…abled ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR is a followup of apache#37825, that change the types in the test relation to make the tests pass with ANSI enalbed. ### Why are the changes needed? To recover the test coverage. Currently it fails with ANSI mode on: https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/3246829492/jobs/5326051798#step:9:20487 ``` [info] - SPARK-40382: eliminate multiple distinct groups due to superficial differences *** FAILED *** (5 milliseconds) [info] org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: [DATATYPE_MISMATCH.BINARY_OP_WRONG_TYPE] Cannot resolve "(b + c)" due to data type mismatch: the binary operator requires the input type ("NUMERIC" or "INTERVAL DAY TO SECOND" or "INTERVAL YEAR TO MONTH" or "INTERVAL"), not "STRING". [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.package$AnalysisErrorAt.dataTypeMismatch(package.scala:68) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis0$5(CheckAnalysis.scala:223) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis.$anonfun$checkAnalysis0$5$adapted(CheckAnalysis.scala:210) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:295) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$foreachUp$1(TreeNode.scala:294) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$foreachUp$1$adapted(TreeNode.scala:294) [info] at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach(ResizableArray.scala:62) [info] at scala.collection.mutable.ResizableArray.foreach$(ResizableArray.scala:55) [info] at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.foreach(ArrayBuffer.scala:49) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:294) [info] at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.$anonfun$foreachUp$1(TreeNode.scala:2 ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, test-only. ### How was this patch tested? Manually ran the tests locally. Closes apache#38250 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-40382-followup. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is a followup of #37825, that change the types in the test relation to make the tests pass with ANSI enalbed.
Why are the changes needed?
To recover the test coverage. Currently it fails with ANSI mode on: https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/3246829492/jobs/5326051798#step:9:20487
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, test-only.
How was this patch tested?
Manually ran the tests locally.