[SPARK-42889][CONNECT][PYTHON] Implement cache, persist, unpersist, and storageLevel #40510
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2023
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2023
|
Merged to master and branch-3.4. |
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2023
…nd storageLevel ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Implements `DataFrame.cache`, `persist`, `unpersist`, and `storageLevel`. ### Why are the changes needed? Missing APIs. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? `DataFrame.cache`, `persist`, `unpersist`, and `storageLevel` will be available. ### How was this patch tested? Added/enabled the related tests. Closes #40510 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-42889/cache. Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit b4f0224) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
LuciferYang
reviewed
Mar 22, 2023
| @@ -54,6 +54,20 @@ message UserContext { | |||
| repeated google.protobuf.Any extensions = 999; | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // StorageLevel for persisting Datasets/Tables. | |||
| message StorageLevel { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
friendly ping @ueshin @HyukjinKwon
When I try to import import "spark/connect/base.proto"; in catalog.proto to reuse StorageLevel for message CacheTable, I found the following compile messages:
spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: File recursively imports itself: spark/connect/base.proto -> spark/connect/commands.proto -> spark/connect/relations.proto -> spark/connect/catalog.proto -> spark/connect/base.proto
spark/connect/catalog.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/base.proto" was not found or had errors.
spark/connect/catalog.proto:144:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import.
spark/connect/catalog.proto:161:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import.
spark/connect/relations.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/catalog.proto" was not found or had errors.
spark/connect/relations.proto:84:5: "Catalog" is not defined.
spark/connect/commands.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors.
spark/connect/commands.proto:63:3: "Relation" is not defined.
spark/connect/commands.proto:81:3: "Relation" is not defined.
spark/connect/commands.proto:142:3: "Relation" is not defined.
spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: Import "spark/connect/commands.proto" was not found or had errors.
spark/connect/base.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors.
....
So should we move StorageLevel to a more suitable place?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah should probably move ..
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
…le to avoid potential `file recursively imports` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? #40510 introduce `message StorageLevel` to `base.proto`, but if we try to import `base.proto` in `catalog.proto` to reuse `StorageLevel` in `message CacheTable` and run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile" to compile, there will be following message in compile log: ``` spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: File recursively imports itself: spark/connect/base.proto -> spark/connect/commands.proto -> spark/connect/relations.proto -> spark/connect/catalog.proto -> spark/connect/base.proto spark/connect/catalog.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/base.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/catalog.proto:144:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/catalog.proto:161:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/relations.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/catalog.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/relations.proto:84:5: "Catalog" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/commands.proto:63:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:81:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:142:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: Import "spark/connect/commands.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/base.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. .... ``` So this pr move `message StorageLevel` to a separate file to avoid this potential file recursively imports. ### Why are the changes needed? To avoid potential file recursively imports. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? - Pass GitHub Actions - Manual check: - Add `import "spark/connect/common.proto";` to `catalog.proto` - run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile"` No compilation logs related to `File recursively imports itself` . Closes #40518 from LuciferYang/SPARK-42889-FOLLOWUP. Lead-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Co-authored-by: YangJie <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2023
…le to avoid potential `file recursively imports` #40510 introduce `message StorageLevel` to `base.proto`, but if we try to import `base.proto` in `catalog.proto` to reuse `StorageLevel` in `message CacheTable` and run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile" to compile, there will be following message in compile log: ``` spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: File recursively imports itself: spark/connect/base.proto -> spark/connect/commands.proto -> spark/connect/relations.proto -> spark/connect/catalog.proto -> spark/connect/base.proto spark/connect/catalog.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/base.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/catalog.proto:144:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/catalog.proto:161:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/relations.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/catalog.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/relations.proto:84:5: "Catalog" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/commands.proto:63:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:81:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:142:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: Import "spark/connect/commands.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/base.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. .... ``` So this pr move `message StorageLevel` to a separate file to avoid this potential file recursively imports. To avoid potential file recursively imports. No - Pass GitHub Actions - Manual check: - Add `import "spark/connect/common.proto";` to `catalog.proto` - run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile"` No compilation logs related to `File recursively imports itself` . Closes #40518 from LuciferYang/SPARK-42889-FOLLOWUP. Lead-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Co-authored-by: YangJie <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 88cc239) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
snmvaughan
pushed a commit
to snmvaughan/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2023
…nd storageLevel ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Implements `DataFrame.cache`, `persist`, `unpersist`, and `storageLevel`. ### Why are the changes needed? Missing APIs. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? `DataFrame.cache`, `persist`, `unpersist`, and `storageLevel` will be available. ### How was this patch tested? Added/enabled the related tests. Closes apache#40510 from ueshin/issues/SPARK-42889/cache. Authored-by: Takuya UESHIN <ueshin@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit b4f0224) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
snmvaughan
pushed a commit
to snmvaughan/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2023
…le to avoid potential `file recursively imports` apache#40510 introduce `message StorageLevel` to `base.proto`, but if we try to import `base.proto` in `catalog.proto` to reuse `StorageLevel` in `message CacheTable` and run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile" to compile, there will be following message in compile log: ``` spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: File recursively imports itself: spark/connect/base.proto -> spark/connect/commands.proto -> spark/connect/relations.proto -> spark/connect/catalog.proto -> spark/connect/base.proto spark/connect/catalog.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/base.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/catalog.proto:144:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/catalog.proto:161:12: "spark.connect.DataType" seems to be defined in "spark/connect/types.proto", which is not imported by "spark/connect/catalog.proto". To use it here, please add the necessary import. spark/connect/relations.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/catalog.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/relations.proto:84:5: "Catalog" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:22:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/commands.proto:63:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:81:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/commands.proto:142:3: "Relation" is not defined. spark/connect/base.proto:23:1: Import "spark/connect/commands.proto" was not found or had errors. spark/connect/base.proto:25:1: Import "spark/connect/relations.proto" was not found or had errors. .... ``` So this pr move `message StorageLevel` to a separate file to avoid this potential file recursively imports. To avoid potential file recursively imports. No - Pass GitHub Actions - Manual check: - Add `import "spark/connect/common.proto";` to `catalog.proto` - run `build/sbt "connect-common/compile"` No compilation logs related to `File recursively imports itself` . Closes apache#40518 from LuciferYang/SPARK-42889-FOLLOWUP. Lead-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Co-authored-by: YangJie <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 88cc239) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Implements
DataFrame.cache,persist,unpersist, andstorageLevel.Why are the changes needed?
Missing APIs.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
DataFrame.cache,persist,unpersist, andstorageLevelwill be available.How was this patch tested?
Added/enabled the related tests.