[SPARK-47004][CONNECT] Added more tests to ClientStreamingQuerySuite to increase Scala client test coverage #45063
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WweiL
reviewed
Feb 8, 2024
...ect/client/jvm/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/ClientStreamingQuerySuite.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
rangadi
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2024
bogao007
changed the title
|
Hi @HyukjinKwon, could you help review this PR and merge if it looks good to you? Thanks! |
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
|
Merged to master. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added more tests to ClientStreamingQuerySuite to increase Scala client test coverage
Why are the changes needed?
To increase test coverage for Streaming Spark Connect Scala client
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
This is a test-only change.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No