Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-47385] Fix tuple encoders with Option inputs. #45508

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chenhao-db
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#40755 adds a null check on the input of the child deserializer in the tuple encoder. It breaks the deserializer for the Option type, because null should be deserialized into None rather than null. This PR adds a boolean parameter to ExpressionEncoder.tuple so that only the user that #40755 intended to fix has this null check.

How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the SQL label Mar 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@cloud-fan cloud-fan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch!

@cloud-fan cloud-fan closed this in 9986462 Mar 14, 2024
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

#40755  adds a null check on the input of the child deserializer in the tuple encoder. It breaks the deserializer for the `Option` type, because null should be deserialized into `None` rather than null. This PR adds a boolean parameter to `ExpressionEncoder.tuple` so that only the user that #40755 intended to fix has this null check.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes #45508 from chenhao-db/SPARK-47385.

Authored-by: Chenhao Li <chenhao.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9986462)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
#40755  adds a null check on the input of the child deserializer in the tuple encoder. It breaks the deserializer for the `Option` type, because null should be deserialized into `None` rather than null. This PR adds a boolean parameter to `ExpressionEncoder.tuple` so that only the user that #40755 intended to fix has this null check.

Unit test.

Closes #45508 from chenhao-db/SPARK-47385.

Authored-by: Chenhao Li <chenhao.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9986462)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
cloud-fan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2024
#40755  adds a null check on the input of the child deserializer in the tuple encoder. It breaks the deserializer for the `Option` type, because null should be deserialized into `None` rather than null. This PR adds a boolean parameter to `ExpressionEncoder.tuple` so that only the user that #40755 intended to fix has this null check.

Unit test.

Closes #45508 from chenhao-db/SPARK-47385.

Authored-by: Chenhao Li <chenhao.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9986462)
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

thanks, merging to master/3.5/3.4/3.3!

sweisdb pushed a commit to sweisdb/spark that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

apache#40755  adds a null check on the input of the child deserializer in the tuple encoder. It breaks the deserializer for the `Option` type, because null should be deserialized into `None` rather than null. This PR adds a boolean parameter to `ExpressionEncoder.tuple` so that only the user that apache#40755 intended to fix has this null check.

## How was this patch tested?

Unit test.

Closes apache#45508 from chenhao-db/SPARK-47385.

Authored-by: Chenhao Li <chenhao.li@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
2 participants