-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
why is the slice_id in params not inconsistent with the actual id? #1368
Comments
fixed in #547 |
6 tasks
zhaoyongjie
added a commit
to zhaoyongjie/incubator-superset
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2021
* refactor: improve code smell for postprocessing * jest UT * best practice for jest
zhaoyongjie
added a commit
to zhaoyongjie/incubator-superset
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2021
* refactor: improve code smell for postprocessing * jest UT * best practice for jest
zhaoyongjie
added a commit
to zhaoyongjie/incubator-superset
that referenced
this issue
Nov 25, 2021
* refactor: improve code smell for postprocessing * jest UT * best practice for jest
zhaoyongjie
added a commit
to zhaoyongjie/incubator-superset
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2021
* refactor: improve code smell for postprocessing * jest UT * best practice for jest
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
created_on | 2016-08-26 19:06:30.122167
changed_on | 2016-10-17 19:44:01.940737
id | 156
slice_name | for_test
druid_datasource_id | 12
table_id |
datasource_type | druid
datasource_name | test_datasource
viz_type | table
params | {\r
| "add_to_dash": "false",\r
| "collapsed_fieldsets": "",\r
| "datasource_id": "12",\r
| "datasource_name": "hotel_mdw_order_v3",\r
| "datasource_type": "druid",\r
| "druid_time_origin": "",\r
| "flt_col_0": "advance_booking_days",\r
| "flt_col_1": "city_code",\r
| "flt_col_2": "terminal_channel_type",\r
| "flt_eq_0": "",\r
| "flt_eq_1": "beijing_city,shanghai_city,chengdu,guangzhou,hangzhou,chongqing_city,shenzhen,xian,xiamen,sanya,wuhan,nanjing,changsha,kunming,qingdao,suzhou_jiangsu,lijiang,tianjin_city,zhengzhou,hongkong_city,dali,hefei,jinan,haerbin,haikou,dalian,guilin,nanning,fuzhou_fujian,shenyang,guiyang,zhuhai,shijiazhuang,ningbo,taiyuan,wulumuqi,nanchang,wuxi,jiaxing,dongguan,",\r
| "flt_eq_2": "app",\r
| "flt_op_0": "in",\r
| "flt_op_1": "in",\r
| "flt_op_2": "in",\r
| "goto_dash": "false",\r
| "granularity": "1 hour",\r
| "groupby": [\r
| "order_date",\r
| "country_name",\r
| "province_name",\r
| "city_name"\r
| ],\r
| "having_col_0": "advance_booking_days",\r
| "having_eq_0": "",\r
| "having_op_0": ">",\r
| "include_search": "false",\r
| "metrics": [\r
| "\u95f4\u591c\u5e73\u5747\u623f\u8d39"\r
| ],\r
| "new_dashboard_name": "",\r
| "new_slice_name": "\u5206\u57ce\u5e02\uff08\u91cd\u70b9\uff09APP",\r
| "number_format": "r",\r
| "rdo_save": "saveas",\r
| "row_limit": "50000",\r
| "save_to_dashboard_id": "",\r
| "since": "2016-8-20",\r
| "slice_id": "155",\r
| "slice_name": "\u5206\u57ce\u5e02\uff08\u91cd\u70b9\uff09APP",\r
| "table_timestamp_format": "smart_date",\r
| "until": "2016-8-21",\r
| "userid": "52",\r
| "viz_type": "table"\r
| }
created_by_fk | 52
changed_by_fk | 54
description |
cache_timeout |
perm | [Druid Cluster].test_datasource
In table slices of caravel database, why is the id of slice not the same as the slice_id in params column?
json_endpoint url requested in dashboard is generated using the items in params.
And as a result the json_endpoint url pass the wrong slice_id.
`class Caravel(BaseCaravelView):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: