Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Migrates Pivot Table v1 to v2 #23712

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jun 8, 2023

Conversation

michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina commented Apr 17, 2023

SUMMARY

This PR migrates the Pivot Table v1 chart to v2. In detail, it does the following:

  • Creates a processor for the Pivot Table chart to convert v1 form_data to v2
  • Augments the base MigrateViz class to support migrating generic chart axes related fields given that some legacy plugins only work without generic chart axes
  • Creates a database migration that invokes the processor
  • Creates a migration test
  • Removes the legacy Pivot Table code and unregisters the plugin.
  • Removes old plugin references throughout the codebase
  • Updates unit tests
  • Updates E2E tests
  • Updates the example dashboards
  • Updates translation files

The following table summarizes the differences in the form_data structure between the versions:

v1 v2 Notes
columns groupbyColumns  
combine_metric combineMetric  
granularity_sqla adhoc_filters.subject Only if GENERIC_CHART_AXES is enabled
groupby groupbyRows  
number_format valueFormat  
pandas_aggfunc aggregateFunction Values changed between versions
pivot_margins rowTotals, colTotals  
row_limit series_limit  
time_range adhoc_filters.comparator Only if GENERIC_CHART_AXES is enabled
timeseries_limit_metric series_limit_metric  
transpose_pivot transposePivot  

* All other keys are the same or exist only in the target version
* The time column type (simple or SQL) affects the adhoc_filters value

AFTER SCREENSHOT

Screenshot 2023-04-19 at 10 24 26

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

1 - Make sure all Pivot Table (legacy) charts were converted to Pivot Table
2 - Make sure Pivot Table (legacy) is not available anymore in the viz picker
3 - Make sure that it's possible to revert the migration by executing superset db downgrade and reverting this PR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

@michael-s-molina
Copy link
Member Author

michael-s-molina commented Apr 19, 2023

@villebro @kgabryje Can you execute the migration in your staging environments to make sure it runs successfully and the charts are correctly migrated? I executed it successfully at Airbnb over thousands of charts.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #23712 (dc08411) into master (e13b80a) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head dc08411 differs from pull request most recent head 611da97. Consider uploading reports for the commit 611da97 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #23712      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.33%   68.37%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1957     1957              
  Lines       75628    75549      -79     
  Branches     8225     8225              
==========================================
- Hits        51680    51658      -22     
+ Misses      21835    21778      -57     
  Partials     2113     2113              
Flag Coverage Δ
hive 53.47% <66.66%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
mysql 79.00% <66.66%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
postgres 79.08% <66.66%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
presto 53.40% <66.66%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
python 82.94% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
sqlite 77.61% <66.66%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
unit 53.81% <100.00%> (+0.36%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rset-frontend/src/components/ReportModal/index.tsx 79.03% <ø> (ø)
...mponents/useExploreAdditionalActionsMenu/index.jsx 60.22% <ø> (-0.45%) ⬇️
...-frontend/src/features/alerts/AlertReportModal.tsx 54.44% <ø> (ø)
...-frontend/src/visualizations/presets/MainPreset.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)
superset/charts/post_processing.py 92.59% <ø> (+3.23%) ⬆️
superset/examples/birth_names.py 70.00% <ø> (ø)
...perset/migrations/shared/migrate_viz/processors.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
superset/viz.py 62.31% <100.00%> (+0.92%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina added risk:breaking-change Issues or PRs that will introduce breaking changes v3.0 Label added by the release manager to track PRs to be included in the 3.0 branch labels Apr 19, 2023
@villebro
Copy link
Member

@michael-s-molina same comment as in #23741; please set 🔥 to class PivotTableViz(BaseViz) in viz.py!

Copy link
Member

@john-bodley john-bodley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding this. So happy to see the removal of legacy visualizations.

superset/migrations/shared/migrate_viz/base.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
superset/viz.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@kgabryje kgabryje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested on my local environment, LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@villebro villebro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very solid work, highly appreciate this! ❤️ LGTM!

@@ -24,11 +11,24 @@
"analysis",
"data"
],
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"homepage": "https://github.com/apache-superset/superset-ui#readme",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bycatch: since that repo is archived, I wonder if we should just point these to the main repo?

Copy link
Member

@rusackas rusackas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!!!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we update all the translation files in a separated pull request?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be possible but the idea was to make the PR atomic by removing the all legacy-related artifacts.

Comment on lines +169 to +186
def with_feature_flags(**mock_feature_flags):
"""
Use this decorator to mock feature flags in tests.integration_tests.

Usage:

class TestYourFeature(SupersetTestCase):

@with_feature_flags(YOUR_FEATURE=True)
def test_your_feature_enabled(self):
self.assertEqual(is_feature_enabled("YOUR_FEATURE"), True)

@with_feature_flags(YOUR_FEATURE=False)
def test_your_feature_disabled(self):
self.assertEqual(is_feature_enabled("YOUR_FEATURE"), False)
"""

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The decorator just mocked a single FF item, in order to support more than 1 FF item, I suggest to provide a DICT structure as a parameter.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets tackle this in a follow-up PR given that this is a copy/paste of the decorator found in the integration tests.

@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina force-pushed the migrate-pivot-table branch 3 times, most recently from 184a21b to 2c86c6d Compare June 6, 2023 19:14
@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina merged commit 522eb97 into apache:master Jun 8, 2023
29 checks passed
@michael-s-molina michael-s-molina removed the v3.0 Label added by the release manager to track PRs to be included in the 3.0 branch label Jun 26, 2023
@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 3.0.0 labels Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels hold! On hold risk:breaking-change Issues or PRs that will introduce breaking changes size/XXL 🚢 3.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants