New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance improvements for ImplicitObjectELResolver #666
Conversation
686f530
to
7a04510
Compare
Benchmarks with JMH JDK11
JDK8
JMH Test Code -
|
7a04510
to
4257836
Compare
Hi @michael-o I wonder if you have any further thoughts/comments on this change and if we could finish the Code Review process soon. |
I cannot make any judgement on any performance improvement. I'd prefer to leave this to other committers. |
Okk, Thanks for letting me know. I will check with the Bug Reviewer. |
The test is not a fair test since the Enum approach doesn't include the cost of the switch. If that is included, the original optimisation is better. I will be applying a version of the original patch provided via BZ 67080. |
Fixes 67080.
Tested the speed using following Test Code -
Which produced following output