-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: clarifying buffer declaration and access #63
Changes from all commits
116cdc4
8c4ebb2
02d6c79
3d7c0fb
ad42e71
e8c278b
12e793e
c108f91
5dbe413
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ | ||
- Feature Name: Clarifying Buffer Declaration and Access | ||
- Author: Wuwei Lin (@vinx13), Eric Lunderberg (@Lunderberg) | ||
- Start Date: 2022-03-18 | ||
- RFC PR: [apache/tvm-rfcs#63](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/63) | ||
- GitHub Issue: [apache/tvm#10505](https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/10505) | ||
|
||
# Summary | ||
[summary]: #summary | ||
|
||
In https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9727 and | ||
[RFC#39](https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/blob/main/rfcs/0039-buffer-physical-layout.md), we | ||
deprecated `Load` and `Store` to use `BufferLoad` and `BufferStore` instead in order to support | ||
generalized multi-dimensional physical buffer access. Here we document necessary clarifications, | ||
implications about the new buffer convention, as well as the post-hoc pass checklist. | ||
|
||
# Motivation | ||
[motivation]: #motivation | ||
|
||
The main goal of this RFC is to summarize the existing buffer convention and the IR changes in | ||
https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9727 which have a broader impact. There are no new semantics | ||
proposed in this RFC. | ||
|
||
# Reference - level explanation | ||
[reference-level-explanation]: #reference-level-explanation | ||
|
||
**What’s a buffer?** | ||
|
||
Buffer is a compile-time representation of contiguous block of memory. Since a Buffer is typically | ||
used as backing storage for a `TensorType`, it includes relevant information from that `TensorType` | ||
which can be sufficiently generalized to an array, such as data type and shape information. | ||
A Buffer needs to be declared and allocated before it can be used. | ||
|
||
**Declaration of buffer** | ||
|
||
Buffer can be declared in the following ways: | ||
|
||
- Inside the `buffer_map` of `PrimFunc`. TIR's type system does not accommodate rich array types, | ||
instead representing them as `T.handle` (typically emitted as `void*`). The `buffer_map` specifies | ||
how to interpret such `T.handle` when using it as a basis for array accesses. | ||
- `T.alloc_buffer` is used `S-TIR` to create and allocate a buffer. | ||
- `T.buffer_decl` can be used to create a buffer alias by specifying the underlying data variable to | ||
reuse the data from another buffer. It can also be used to reinterpret the data type of the buffer. | ||
`T.buffer_decl` can also be used to create a buffer alias with a different `elem_offset`. | ||
`elem_offset` should be handled during the lowering process. | ||
|
||
Examples of `T.buffer_decl` is shown below. | ||
``` | ||
@T.prim_func | ||
def buffer_alias(A: T.Buffer[(16,), "float"]): | ||
A_vector = T.buffer_decl([4], "float32x4", data=A.data) | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def buffer_alloc(): | ||
A = T.buffer_decl([4, 4], "float32") | ||
Allocate(A.data, [16], "float32") | ||
``` | ||
|
||
In the future, we will consider renaming `T.buffer_decl` to `T.decl_buffer` to make it name a verb | ||
phase that is consistent with the existing ones like `T.alloc_buffer`, `T.match_buffer`. | ||
|
||
**Allocation of buffer** | ||
|
||
In low-level TIR, `tir::Allocate` is used to allocate a data variable with given shapes. `tir::Allocate` | ||
returns a data variable of type `T.handle` (since TIR's type system does not accommodate rich arrays), which may be | ||
reinterpreted with a different shape or data type using `T.buffer_decl`. | ||
|
||
**Explicit `DeclBuffer` IR construct** | ||
|
||
`T.buffer_decl` doesn't correspond to a TIR node. Instead, `T.buffer_decl` returns either: | ||
- A Buffer node whose data member points to the aliased Buffer. | ||
- A Buffer node whose data member is a new pointer-type Var (the var is expected to be initialized | ||
via tir::Allocate elsewhere)" | ||
|
||
The current behavior of `TVMScriptPrinter` is to implicitly print a `T.buffer_decl` at the beginning | ||
of `PrimFunc` for any undefined buffers. The implicit behavior can be error-prone. In light of the | ||
migration, we should consider an explicit `DeclBuffer` as part of the IR. This will be further | ||
discussed in a separate RFC. | ||
|
||
**Buffer Aliasing** | ||
|
||
`T.buffer_decl` creates a buffer alias if the underlying data variable (`.data` field) overlaps with | ||
another buffer. Buffer created via `T.alloc_buffer` always do not alias. Buffer aliases do not need | ||
`Allocate` to create the data variable -- they may simply reuse the data variable from the Buffer | ||
being aliased. If a transformation would produce multiple allocations of the same buffer var | ||
(e.g. unrolling a loop that contains an allocation), the transform should update the allocations to | ||
be unique using `tvm::tir::ConvertSSA`. | ||
|
||
Buffers should not alias each other unless necessary, because aliased buffers increase complexity | ||
for TIR transformations. Passes that rewrite buffers should clearly indicate how aliased buffers | ||
are handled. For example, when changing the underlying layout of stored elements in a buffer, all | ||
buffer aliases must also be updated. Currently, we don't have analysis for buffer aliasing. | ||
This is a future developement task if buffer aliasing is used broadly. Therefore, while buffer | ||
aliasing is typically free at runtime, this imposes a cost for buffer aliasing both to compile times | ||
and development complexity. | ||
|
||
**Discussion: When it is safe to transform a buffer** | ||
|
||
We would like to discuss some examples of when it is safe to transform a buffer w.r.t. aliasing rules: | ||
1. reshape | ||
2. layout transform (e.g. swap indices) | ||
3. compact. | ||
|
||
(1) is fine under aliasing as long as the low level memory is shared. This is because buffer alias | ||
here is used to reinterpret a buffer, which only changes the way we access the buffer. As long as | ||
there are no other buffer transformations or analysis applied to this buffer, it is safe to use the | ||
alias. | ||
|
||
On the other hand, any transformations or analysis applied on a buffer should be clear how to handle | ||
buffer aliases correctly. (2) and (3) are such examples, they would need more | ||
cares. (2) requires all the aliases be changed together. (3) requires to compute the compact buffer | ||
shape and then rewrite the buffer shape. This need us to take all alias into consideration and then | ||
rewrite their shapes together. | ||
|
||
**Generalizing buffer accesses** | ||
|
||
Previously we used `Load` and `Store` to represent low-level buffer accesses. `Load` and `Store` | ||
consist of data variable, data type and index, which can be directly translated to pointer cast and | ||
accesses in runtime. Note that data type given to `Load` / `Store` can be different from the | ||
Buffer's data variable type. For example, | ||
|
||
```python | ||
A = T.buffer_decl(shape=(16,), dtype='float') | ||
T.load("float4", A.data, T.ramp(4, 1, 4)) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
can be translated to | ||
|
||
```cpp | ||
*((float4*)(A + 4)) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
in C codegen. | ||
|
||
However, `BufferLoad` and `BufferStore` themselves can not reinterpret a buffer to a different shape | ||
or data type. They always return the data type specified on underlying buffer object. This is the | ||
fundamental difference between `Load/Store` and `BufferLoad/BufferStore` that we need to deal with | ||
carefully. | ||
|
||
Vectorized access is achieved by using `Ramp` as index in `Load/Store`. Vectorized buffer access | ||
via `BufferLoad`/`BufferStore` can be achieved either by using a scalar index to access a buffer | ||
that has a vectorized type, or by using `Ramp` as an index into a buffer that has a scalar type. | ||
For N-D buffer indices, it is possible that `Ramp` being used in multiple dimensions | ||
(e.g. `A[Ramp(...), ..., Ramp(...)]` ). In this case the number of lanes of the data type of such | ||
value is the product of each `Ramp`. We limit `Ramp` to only the last dimension as multiple `Ramp` | ||
creates additional complexity. | ||
|
||
Different combinations of buffer type and index type (scalar vs. vector) are clarified in | ||
|
||
[RFC#39](https://github.com/Lunderberg/tvm-rfcs/blob/data_layout/rfcs/0039-buffer-physical-layout.md#rationale-and-alternatives), | ||
excerpts are the following: | ||
|
||
```python | ||
@T.prim_func | ||
def scalar_load_from_scalar_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(64,), "float32"]): | ||
assert A[0].dtype == "float32" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def vector_load_from_vector_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(16,), "float32x4"]): | ||
assert A[0].dtype == "float32x4" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def vector_load_from_vector_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(16,), "float32x4"]): | ||
A_vector_2 = T.buffer_decl([32], "float32x2", data=A.data) | ||
assert A[0].dtype == "float32x4" | ||
assert A_vector_2[0].dtype == "float32x2" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def vector_load_from_scalar_buffer_option1(A: T.Buffer[(64,), "float32"]): | ||
assert A[T.ramp(0, 1, 4)].dtype == "float32x4" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def vector_load_from_scalar_buffer_option2(A: T.Buffer[(64,), "float32"]): | ||
A_vector = T.buffer_decl([16], "float32x4", data=A.data) | ||
assert A_vector[0].dtype == "float32x4" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def scalar_load_from_vector_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(16,), "float32x4"]): | ||
A_scalar = T.buffer_decl([64], "float32", data=A.data) | ||
assert A_scalar[0].dtype == "float32" | ||
|
||
#multiple dimensional buffer accesses | ||
@T.prim_func | ||
def nd_scalar_load_from_scalar_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(64, 64,), "float32"]): | ||
assert A[0, 0].dtype == "float32" | ||
|
||
@T.prim_func | ||
def nd_vector_load_from_scalar_buffer(A: T.Buffer[(64,64), "float32"]): | ||
assert A[0, T.ramp(0, 1, 4)].dtype == "float32x4" | ||
``` | ||
|
||
In rare cases, vector index can be used to access a vector buffer. We leave this usage as | ||
undefined until we have a clear use case. | ||
|
||
**VectorBufferRewrite** | ||
|
||
In some backend like SPIR-V where runtime pointer casts are not available, even between types that | ||
differ only in the number of lanes (e.g. `float16` and `float16x4.`), `VectorTypeRewriter` will be | ||
used to rewrite the buffer to a vector type. (VectorBufferRewrite rewrites the buffer from | ||
`vector_load_from_scalar_buffer` into `scalar_load_from_vector_buffer` in the above example). | ||
|
||
**Removing pre-flattened buffer** | ||
vinx13 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
Buffer information before flattening are necessary during compilation. They specify the calling | ||
convention of `PrimFunc` and are translated to assertions of buffer shapes, strides, etc. in | ||
runtime. `preflattened_buffer_map` was introduced in https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/9727 to | ||
save these information after buffer flattening. | ||
|
||
During the lowering process, although buffer accesses inside `PrimFunc` are flattened to match | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I have a proof-of-concept implementation of this removal at apache/tvm#10940. It is able to pass all tests in There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nice. We can then consider moving to explicit |
||
physical buffer dimensions, the calling convention of the `PrimFunc` are kept unchanged - It still | ||
expect the parameter to have multi-dimensional logical buffer shape. Therefore, we would like to | ||
unify `preflattened_buffer_map` and `buffer_map`. `buffer_map` should be kept unchanged during | ||
buffer flattening. Instead, we declare an aliasing buffer as the flattened buffer after flattening. | ||
For example, after flattening, the TIR will look like | ||
|
||
```python | ||
def fn(X: T.Buffer([2, 3], "float32"): | ||
X_flattened = T.buffer_decl(X.data, [6], "float32") | ||
for i in grid(6): | ||
X_flattened[i] = .... | ||
``` | ||
|
||
# Pass Checklist | ||
|
||
Here are a list of TIR passes that can be impacted significantly when migrating from `Load/Store` to | ||
`BufferLoad/BufferStore`. | ||
|
||
- `StorageFlatten` / `FlattenBuffer`: These passes flatten buffer to physical dimensions. As | ||
discussed above, they should create flattened buffer via `T.buffer_decl` while keeping `buffer_map` | ||
unchanged (see the discussion in *Removing pre-flattened buffer* section). Any subsequent passes | ||
that rewrite buffer, such as, `InjectDoubleBuffer`, `InjectVirtualThread` , should operate on | ||
physical buffers and should not changing the number of buffer dimensions. `Allocate` after | ||
flattening will reflect physical buffer dimensions. Alternatively, these passes could be made | ||
simpler by moving them to occur before the buffer is flattened. For example, implementing | ||
`InjectDoubleBuffer` by changing the shape to `[2, *old_shape]`, and accessing using `[i%2, | ||
*old_indices]`. That would limit the size/stride handling to occur only during buffer flattening. | ||
- VectorizeLoop: This pass should rewrite buffer indices to `Ramp` for vectorized accesses, should | ||
consider limiting vector index as the last dimension. | ||
- `StorageRewrite`: This pass should be extended to handle N-D physical buffer. | ||
- `VectorTypeRewriter` should also consider limiting vector index as the last dimension. | ||
- `MakePackedAPI`: This pass adds additional parameters (variables) to `PrimFunc` according to the | ||
FFI calling convention. These variables can no longer be used in `Load` directly. Buffer should be | ||
declared and then `BufferLoad` should be used to access values of these parameters. | ||
- `LowerThreadAllreduce`: This pass is involved with a few buffer rewriting. Need to check buffer | ||
declarations / accesses follow the new convention here. | ||
|
||
# Conclusion and Key takeaways | ||
- `T.buffer_decl` creates buffer alias, it is important to consider implications and use | ||
`T.buffer_decl` properly. Passes that transform buffers should consider how to buffer alias. | ||
Therefore we should be able to have a unified method called `T.buffer_decl` in both TIR and | ||
TVMScript. | ||
- There are several way for buffer definition, `T.buffer_decl, T.match_buffer, T.alloc_buffer`. | ||
- `BufferLoad/BufferStore` can be generalized to allow `Ramp` as part of the index. | ||
- `T.buffer_decl` is going to be used to declare flattened Buffer aliases, and | ||
`preflattened_buffer_map` will be removed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you mean
T.decl_buffer
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. In TVM script, it is
T.buffer_decl
and we have plan to rename it toT.decl_buffer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, if you're using
T.
notation here, you mean TVMScript, right? in which case, can you update all occurrences to match what you would grep for if using TVMScript? right now it's a dead-end.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you add a note so someone knows what to grep for post-future rename?