Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZOOKEEPER-4446 branch-3.6 txnLogCountTest use wrong version of Junit Assert import #1797

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

phang98
Copy link

@phang98 phang98 commented Jan 19, 2022

This PR mean to fix the invalid import static for junit Assert that only available in Junit 5.

Copy link
Member

@maoling maoling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • +1. Great catch. This issue was introduced by PR-1744 when I applied that patch to branch-3.6 which without using junit-5 and no code conflicts
  • @eolivelli PTAL

Copy link
Contributor

@eolivelli eolivelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@symat
Copy link
Contributor

symat commented Jan 25, 2022

sorry, I just merged ZooKeeper 3988 to branch 3.6, and fixed this issue together with the similar junit issue in that PR to make it work. I was not aware that this was already discovered and you already prepared a separate PR for txnLogCountTest.

@phang98
Copy link
Author

phang98 commented Jan 26, 2022

no worry, anyone who trying to build branch-3.6 will notice anyway. I was just surprise this is broken for quite sometime when I try to build to validate this branch with latest jetty server. May be we can closed this PR now.

@maoling
Copy link
Member

maoling commented Jan 26, 2022

@phang98 Thanks for your contribution. Since this issue had been fixed by this, let me close this PR

@maoling maoling closed this Jan 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants