[ZOOKEEPER-4642] Remove Travis CI

[eolivelli]

No description provided.

[cnauroth]

+1

Thank you, @eolivelli !

[kezhuw]

Hmm, seems that we lost ci for arm64 ? ZOOKEEPER-4668(#1975) added back s390x in jenkins. Given that we have c client, I think it is valuable to enable ci for multiple archs. cc @ztzg @ctubbsii

[ctubbsii]

@kezhuw wrote:

Hmm, seems that we lost ci for arm64 ? ZOOKEEPER-4668(#1975) added back s390x in jenkins. Given that we have c client, I think it is valuable to enable ci for multiple archs. cc @ztzg @ctubbsii

I have no idea why I'm being tagged here. @kezhuw if you don't have a specific question for somebody, I don't recommend that you tag them. If they want to follow an issue, they can do so on their own. Otherwise, all you've done is annoy them with a confusing notification that requires them to try to figure out why they are being tagged, and potentially forces them to be subscribed to an issue they did not want to follow. I don't generally mind people tagging me for a good reason, but just tagging without a reason is really frustrating. Please don't do that.

[kezhuw]

I saw #1508 which you created and didn't not break arm64 ci introduced in #1433 which you approved. @ctubbsii Sorry for this tagging, I will try to not unless strong reason. Thank you to let me know this! I usually tracked issue history a bit to find someone for opinion/review. Next time, I will describe the reason.

Also, I cced @ztzg for both #1433 and C skill in case he feel annoying too.