Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix nullable property on denormalization #703

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2016

Conversation

soyuka
Copy link
Member

@soyuka soyuka commented Aug 25, 2016

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets
License MIT
Doc PR

Bug introduced in e58bd73

@dunglas
Copy link
Member

dunglas commented Aug 25, 2016

👍 (when the CI will be green). Good catch @soyuka

@soyuka
Copy link
Member Author

soyuka commented Aug 25, 2016

How is it that appveyor takes ~3 min whereas travis takes ~20 min?

@dunglas
Copy link
Member

dunglas commented Aug 25, 2016

Code coverage computation... But only one build is slow. The the other one take a few minutes.

@soyuka
Copy link
Member Author

soyuka commented Aug 25, 2016

still 7 min for the lowest test (without coverage) on my PR vs ~3 min on app veyor, weird.

Dunno if scrutinizer is blocked right now.

@dunglas
Copy link
Member

dunglas commented Aug 25, 2016

I just pushed a commit to optimize the build when running in non-coverage mode: 056a63f

The Travis build also check Swagger compliance (it requires downloading some NPM packages), the AppVeyor build doesn't do that.

@dunglas dunglas merged commit e600255 into api-platform:master Aug 25, 2016
@dunglas
Copy link
Member

dunglas commented Aug 25, 2016

Thanks you very much for discovering and fixing this bug @soyuka!

@soyuka soyuka deleted the fixnullable branch August 25, 2016 22:10
magarzon pushed a commit to magarzon/core that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2017
Fix nullable property on denormalization
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants