Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Improved security by replacing the custom secret CR_PAT with the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN in the GitHub Actions workflow file ai_code_reviewer.yml. #1075

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2023

Conversation

mr-kelly
Copy link
Contributor

@mr-kelly mr-kelly commented Jul 13, 2023

Submit a pull request for this project.

Why?

What?

How?

Summary by OpenAI

Bug fix: Improved security by replacing the custom secret CR_PAT with the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN in the GitHub Actions workflow file ai_code_reviewer.yml.

"Code reviewed, secrets secured,
Bugs squashed, no longer obscured.
With GITHUB_TOKEN, we embrace,
A safer workflow, a stronger base."

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 OpenAI

High-level Summary

The changeset includes modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file ai_code_reviewer.yml. The main change is the replacement of the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable with ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}. This change improves security by using the recommended approach for accessing the GitHub token. However, a thorough review is necessary to ensure that the modification does not introduce any unintended side effects or break the functionality of the workflow.

File Summaries

File Summary
.github/workflows/ai_code_reviewer.yml The diff updates the workflow file to use the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN secret instead of a custom secret named CR_PAT. This change improves security and falls under the category of logic/functionality modification. It should be reviewed to ensure it doesn't introduce any unintended side effects or break the workflow's functionality.

Please let me know if you need further assistance or if there are additional changesets to review.


Chat with 🤖 OpenAI Bot (@openai)

  • Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
  • Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging @openai in a reply.

Code suggestions

  • The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
  • You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.

Ignoring further reviews

  • Type @openai: ignore anywhere in the PR description to ignore further reviews from the bot.


In the recent run, only the files that changed from the base of the PR and between e304d4c43a4d77fcb301dde25241c130e93b84e7 and 6ae418e68ee2c16b586b170bc8b40b15cd954eac commits were reviewed.

Comment on lines 20 to +23
steps:
- uses: fluxninja/openai-pr-reviewer@latest
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CR_PAT}}
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 OpenAI

The value of the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable is being updated to ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}. This change improves security by using the recommended approach for accessing the GitHub token. It's important to ensure that the new value is correctly set and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects or break the workflow's functionality.

29:
There is no need to remove the newline at the end of the file. It can be kept as it is.

Overall, the changes look good and address the security concern by updating the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable.

@mr-kelly mr-kelly changed the title chore: Update ai_code_reviewer.yml fix: Improved security by replacing the custom secret CR_PAT with the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN in the GitHub Actions workflow file ai_code_reviewer.yml. Jul 13, 2023
@mr-kelly mr-kelly merged commit ae34c23 into develop Jul 13, 2023
13 checks passed
@mr-kelly mr-kelly deleted the chore/ai_code_reviewer branch July 13, 2023 03:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant