Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: If loading a certain namespace fails, only attempt to retrieve t… #300

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

qdsordinarydream
Copy link
Contributor

@qdsordinarydream qdsordinarydream commented Mar 4, 2024

…he corresponding namespace from the backup instead of attempting to retrieve all namespaces from the backup

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the synchronization of Apollo configurations by refining argument usage in the configuration loading process.

…he corresponding namespace from the backup instead of attempting to retrieve all namespaces from the backup
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 4, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent modification focuses on enhancing the configuration synchronization process within a specific function. By altering the argument used in a backup configuration loading method, the update aims at improving the accuracy and efficiency of the configuration management system. This small, yet significant change, streamlines the process of keeping configurations synchronized across different components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
component/.../sync.go Modified argument in syncApolloConfig for loadBackupConfig from appConfig.NamespaceName to namespace.

🐇💻
In the land of code and bits,
A tiny change makes a giant leap.
From appConfig to namespace it shifts,
Ensuring configs in sync we keep.
🌟🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 4, 2024

感谢您提出Pull Request,我会尽快Review。我会在1-2日内进行查看或者回复,如果遇到节假日可能会处理较慢,敬请谅解。

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 914cd4f and c1edb32.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • component/remote/sync.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
component/remote/sync.go (1)
  • 111-111: The change to pass the namespace variable to loadBackupConfig instead of appConfig.NamespaceName aligns with the PR's objective to refine error handling by focusing on the specific namespace that encountered a loading issue. This targeted approach should enhance the efficiency of the error recovery process. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect other parts of the system that rely on the previous behavior.
  • The modification is logically sound and directly addresses the issue described in the PR objectives.
  • It's recommended to verify that this change does not impact other components or functionalities that might have depended on the broader recovery attempt. This can be done by reviewing usage of the loadBackupConfig function elsewhere in the codebase and ensuring that its new behavior is compatible with all use cases.
Verification successful

The analysis of the loadBackupConfig function calls across the codebase indicates that the change in sync.go, where the namespace variable is now passed instead of appConfig.NamespaceName, is compatible with the existing call in async.go. Both calls adhere to the function's signature, suggesting that the change should not adversely affect the system's functionality. However, it's advisable to review the internal logic of loadBackupConfig to ensure it can correctly handle inputs from both contexts, focusing on the specific namespace that encountered a loading issue and the broader application configuration.

  • The modification to pass the namespace variable to loadBackupConfig in sync.go is consistent with the function's usage elsewhere in the codebase and aligns with the PR's objectives.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other calls to loadBackupConfig to ensure they are compatible with the change.
rg "loadBackupConfig" --type go

Length of output: 343

@qdsordinarydream
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

Copy link
Member

@nobodyiam nobodyiam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Mar 6, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8136293155

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 74.138%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 5706641819: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1290
Relevant Lines: 1740

💛 - Coveralls

@nobodyiam nobodyiam merged commit 9a6597d into apolloconfig:master Mar 6, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants