disable maybeDeepFreeze

[kadosh1000]

Hi, I have an issue with apollo-client using angular 4.
I have a service fetching data from the server.

The thing is that in my component need to be able to add items to an array returned from the service.
But I keep getting errors indicating that the object and the array inside of it are frozen.

After deeply looking into the package I've seen that the object is being frozen in dev mode using the util maybeDeepFreeze. How can I override it? disable it? or bypass it?

[intellix]

I think it's strange that this is only done on development rather than being consistent across environments. It'll lead to a few WTF moments I imagine.

I've also got a case where I'd like to disable deep-freezing for an individual query but I'm not sure how it'd affect the store.

Our use-case is that we're passing an object of properties to a third-party client who check that object and add/remove things. With our REST API it just worked but with Apollo it's frozen. I've basically got to manually destructure everything manually to ensure it can be edited like:

// Deeply unfreeze everything
const options = { ...data.options };
options.mobileParams = { ...options.mobileParams };
options.liveParams = { ...options.liveParams };

As is with third-parties, we can't tell them not to rely on the reference because they assume you haven't read the documentation/implemented it properly :D

[kadosh1000]

@intellix I think maybe convert the individual queries I need to "unfreeze" to normal $http.post requests.
Why don't you use that?

[jbaxleyiii]

@intellix if I'm not mistaken, the desire for it to only be present in development mode was for performance reasons when running it in production. That use case certainly shows problems with the current implementation though.

@stubailo do you have any thoughts here?

[kadosh1000]

@jbaxleyiii @stubailo
I would really appreciate a quick reply on this issue, as it has really stuck my project.
Any workaround I can do for now? any suggestions?

I think the best option is to allow configure in the client configuration rather to enable the freeze feature or not, and let the default to be true. This way if there is no need to change the data retrieved than it's all remain the same.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale becuase it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions to Apollo Client!

[mattapperson]

I am also more irritated with this then pleased it exists... :/

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale becuase it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions to Apollo Client!

[stale]

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity after being marked as stale. If you belive this issue is still a problem or should be reopened, please reopen it! Thank you for your contributions to Apollo Client!

[miguelcaravantes]

i want disable frezee

[Cito]

See PrimeNG issue #4600 for a concrete case where this is problematic. You get an error message "Cannot add property _$visited, object is not extensible" when displaying the query result in a PrimeNG data table and there is no dataKey set. Would be nice if this would be configurable (globally and per query).

[OutThisLife]

👍

[intellix]

This is griefing me to no end. If you've got deeply nested edges that you need to merge during a subscribe you'll want to kill yourself. I'm thinking there has to be some sort of helper functionality exported to help. Consider how unreasonable it is to add a pet below:

const prev = {
  people: {
    edges: [
      {
        node: {
          id: 'UGVyc29uOjE=',
          name: 'Dominic',
          status: 'suicidal',
          pets: {
            edges: [
              {
                node: {
                  id: 'UGV0OjE=',
                  personId: 'UGVyc29uOjE=',
                  type: 'dog',
                  name: 'Boris',
                },
              },
            ],
          },
        },
      },
    ],
  },
};

deepFreeze(prev);

const newEdge = {
  node: {
    id: 'UGV0OjI=',
    personId: 'UGVyc29uOjE=',
    type: 'cat',
    name: 'Clyde',
  },
};

// As far as I know, you have to do all of the below:

const personEdge = prev.people.edges.find(e => e.node.id === newEdge.node.personId);
const newPersonEdge = {
  ...personEdge,
  node: {
    ...personEdge.node,
    pets: {
      ...personEdge.node.pets,
      edges: [
        ...personEdge.node.pets.edges,
        newEdge,
      ],
    },
  },
};

const newPersonEdges = prev.people.edges.filter(e => e.node.id !== newPersonEdge.node.id).concat(newPersonEdge);
let newPrev = {
  ...prev,
  people: {
    ...prev.people,
    edges: newPersonEdges,
  },
};

This reminds me of callback hell. I call it: spreading hell

[NathanWalker]

Curious of the same? Very frustrating here

[mwld]

If you need to alter the returned frozen data you could clone it before subscribing. One easy way would be to use Lodash’s cloneDeep (https://lodash.com/docs#cloneDeep).

apollo.watchQuery(...)
    .valueChanges
    .map(({ data }) => _.cloneDeep(data))
        .subscribe(
            data => {
                // This data will not be frozen.
            });

[NathanWalker]

Thanks @mwld - preferably without an extra dependency and avoids spreading hell - an appropriate term @intellix

[julienvincent]

I think there should be a way to disable freezing. In my use case I am using immer within my mutation update functions, but am unable to due to this object freezing.

Can this issue be re-opened and properly discussed?

[hwillson]

Hi all - re-opening. We're reconsidering the use of maybeDeepFreeze, and might remove it completely (making results mutable). Making sure state is immutable is great in a lot of cases, but the fact that we're only locking things down in dev/test environments, and not in prod, doesn't quite sit right. We're not deep freezing in production because it's expensive, but we also think it's important to align dev and prod environments (as we don't want to introduce hard to debug environment based issues). More details shortly - thanks!

[nagman]

@hwillson Thanks for reconsidering it.
Any idea of when it will be implemented?
This is a really needed fix.

[michaeldoye]

This is a bit of a problem for one of my apps as well.

I am working around it like this for now:

return this.apollo.watchQuery({...})
  .valueChanges
  .pipe(map((data) => {
    const clonedObj = JSON.stringify(data);
    return JSON.parse(clonedObj);
  }));

which works fine but is not really ideal.

[smkhalsa]

@hwillson I am also dealing with the very frustrating consequences of this. Any update on making maybeDeepFreeze optional or removing it altogether?

[Christilut]

Same problem here. I don't see a reason to make properties read only, it just bothers me. Working around it like this:

      const items = new Array(...this.data.items)

      items.splice(i, 1, v)

      this.data.items = items

[hwillson]

#3883 disables deep freezing; query results will be mutable in the next release. Thanks all!