Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Use the new session payload creator inherited from Selenium #1535

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

mykola-mokhnach
Copy link
Contributor

@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach commented Oct 18, 2021

Change list

The NewAppiumSessionPayload is very hacky and also hard to read. It basically copies the most of NewSessionPayload Selenium class while adding some specific workarounds on top of that. The idea is to get rid of it and use the original implementation from Selenium as we don't want or need to do jwp->w3c conversion anymore. Also removed the obsolete FORCE_MJSONWP capability.

Types of changes

  • No changes in production code.
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

… into appium_payload_rm

# Conflicts:
#	src/main/java/io/appium/java_client/remote/AppiumCommandExecutor.java
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach changed the title [DO NOT MERGE] refactor!: Use the new session payload creator inherited from Selenium refactor!: Use the new session payload creator inherited from Selenium Oct 21, 2021
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach changed the title refactor!: Use the new session payload creator inherited from Selenium refactor: Use the new session payload creator inherited from Selenium Oct 21, 2021
@SrinivasanTarget SrinivasanTarget merged commit 92396dc into appium:master Oct 21, 2021
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach deleted the appium_payload_rm branch October 22, 2021 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants