Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SNMP backend suggests IPP for Dell 1700n, but only LPD works #2354

Closed
michaelrsweet opened this issue Apr 23, 2007 · 1 comment
Closed

SNMP backend suggests IPP for Dell 1700n, but only LPD works #2354

michaelrsweet opened this issue Apr 23, 2007 · 1 comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists priority-medium question General usage question
Milestone

Comments

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator

Version: 1.2.8
CUPS.org User: till.kamppeter

See following report at Ubuntu:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cupsys/+bug/107824

The user sets up a Dell 1700n with the URI

ipp://192.168.1.3:631/ipp

which was suggested by the SNMP backend (and therefore listed under the auto-detected printers in the gnome-cups-manager). Independent which driver he chooses (PostScript, pxlmono) the printer does not print.

Setting it up manually with the URI

lpd://192.168.1.3

makes the printer working perfectly. Also accessing it via a SMB share on a Windows box makes it working.

Either the IPP backend needs to be fixed or in the SNMP backend for Dell printers LPD URIs should be suggested.

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CUPS.org User: mike

Dupe of STR #2035, deferring to CUPS 1.3.

Basically, that 1700n needs a firmware update to support IPP, and the current rev is broken.

@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added priority-medium duplicate This issue or pull request already exists question General usage question labels Mar 17, 2016
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added this to the Stable milestone Mar 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists priority-medium question General usage question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant