Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Build] Clarify BuildPlan.Error.missingLinuxMain #1920

Merged

Conversation

matthewseaman
Copy link
Contributor

@matthewseaman matthewseaman commented Dec 28, 2018

[SR-8646] BuildPlan.Error.missingLinuxMain description rephrasing

Make it clear that LinuxMain.swift must be at the top level of the Tests directory.

Tests do not appear to quote error messages.

Make it clear that LinuxMain.swift must be at the top level.
[SR-8646] BuildPlan.Error.missingLinuxMain description rephrasing
@@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ public class BuildPlan {
public var description: String {
switch self {
case .missingLinuxMain:
return "missing LinuxMain.swift file"
return "missing LinuxMain.swift file at top level"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be more clear to say something like "missing LinuxMain.swift file in the Tests directory"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed.

Make it clear that LinuxMain.swift must be in the Tests directory, rather than just an arbitrary "top level".
[SR-8646] BuildPlan.Error.missingLinuxMain description rephrasing
@ankitspd
Copy link
Member

ankitspd commented Jan 2, 2019

@swift-ci smoke test

@ankitspd ankitspd merged commit a6f3c28 into apple:master Jan 3, 2019
@matthewseaman matthewseaman deleted the 8646-missing-linux-main-description branch January 3, 2019 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants