[AutoDiff] [Sema] Include certain 'let' properties in 'Differentiable' derived conformances. #33700
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Today,
let
properties are treated as if they had@noDerivative
and excluded from the derivedDifferentiable
conformance implementation. This is limiting to properties that have a non-mutatingmove(along:)
(e.g. class properties), which can be mathematically treated as differentiable variables.This patch changes the derived conformances behavior such that
let
properties will be included as differentiable variables if they have a non-mutatingmove(along:)
. This unblocks the following code:Resolves SR-13474 (rdar://67982207).