-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
Provide Jetty images based on openjdk:11-jre-slim #103
Comments
@md5 I'm guessing we should just make another variant rather than make everybody use slim? |
Yeah, I think this would be another variant. It makes sense to me, given the lack of a JDK 11 for Alpine for the time being. |
At this point this should probably be co-opted to account for docker-library/openjdk#322. 😞 |
@tianon can you comment a bit more on the implications of docker-library/openjdk#322 ? Also, I think it is time to look at jkd13... there are currently slim and buster varieties of that. |
Cleaned up jetty-home usage Tested the approach for slim JDKs by adding another multi stage to do the validation, since gpg is not available in slim builds Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
The merge of #121 created the slim images, but has broken the architecture rules. |
This issue has been moved to the new Official Eclipse Jetty Docker repository. |
I see the current jre-11 based Jetty image is based off openjdk:11-jre.
To reduce image size, it would be valuable if Jetty images existed that were based off the openjdk:11-jre-slim image.
Thank you for your consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: