chore: CE linting changes

[rishabhrathod01]

Description

PR fixes following issue(s)

Fixes # (issue number)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Chore (housekeeping or task changes that don't impact user perception)
• This change requires a documentation update

Testing

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Also list any relevant details for your test configuration.
Delete anything that is not relevant

• Manual
• JUnit
• Jest
• Cypress

Test Plan

Add Testsmith test cases links that relate to this PR

Issues raised during DP testing

Link issues raised during DP testing for better visiblity and tracking (copy link from comments dropped on this PR)

Checklist:

Dev activity

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• PR is being merged under a feature flag

QA activity:

• Speedbreak features have been covered
• Test plan covers all impacted features and areas of interest
• Test plan has been peer reviewed by project stakeholders and other QA members
• Manually tested functionality on DP
• We had an implementation alignment call with stakeholders post QA Round 2
• Cypress test cases have been added and approved by SDET/manual QA
• Added Test Plan Approved label after Cypress tests were reviewed
• Added Test Plan Approved label after JUnit tests were reviewed

[rishabhrathod01]

/ok-to-test sha=b6a5b59

[github-actions]

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/6746109011.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Commit: b6a5b59.
PR: 28629.

[ApekshaBhosale]

if you have deleted entityConstructorMap.ts from ce and ee. it should be common somewhere right? @Rishabh-Rathod

[rishabhrathod01]

if you have deleted entityConstructorMap.ts from ce and ee. it should be common somewhere right? @Rishabh-Rathod

@ApekshaBhosale We won't be using entityConstructorMap anymore, this PR has new changes where we extend the entityFactory class.
This was the suggestion i got from FE coders.

[github-actions]

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/6746109011.
Commit: b6a5b59.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:

1. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Binding/Button_Text_WithRecaptcha_spec.js

2. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/BugTests/Bug27817_Spec.ts
3. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Templates/Fork_Template_Existing_app_spec.js

To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

[rishabhrathod01]

/ok-to-test sha=b6a5b59

[github-actions]

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/6754552854.
Workflow: Appsmith External Integration Test Workflow.
Commit: b6a5b59.
PR: 28629.

[github-actions]

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/6754552854.
Commit: b6a5b59.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:

1. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Form/FormWidget_Select_TreeSelect_spec.js

To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here