Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: Identifying radio type for APRS device ids #91

Closed
borjam opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Suggestion: Identifying radio type for APRS device ids #91

borjam opened this issue Aug 4, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@borjam
Copy link

borjam commented Aug 4, 2023

Hello,

Now that APRS-LoRa is growing but it hasn't grown too much, I think it would be a good idea to consider some way to identify devices based on the radio type used. VHF "analog" TNC, LoRa, maybe others in the future.

I know it's a far reaching change, just suggesting it should be considered.

@borjam borjam changed the title Identifying radio type for APRS device ids Suggestion: Identifying radio type for APRS device ids Aug 4, 2023
@hessu
Copy link
Member

hessu commented Aug 4, 2023

A lot of the software can be used with any type of radio interface, so I'm not sure about this.

I'd like to perhaps avoid adding a lot of additional details to the entries. When more data is added, there will be more changes to manage.

@borjam
Copy link
Author

borjam commented Aug 4, 2023

I know it's not a trivial question and it would need careful consideration! But maybe in the future more radio interfaces will appear. Fow now LoRa is offering promising results, and there are even products available in the market.

So, just seeding an idea!

@hessu
Copy link
Member

hessu commented Aug 13, 2023

Yep, thanks.

Not starting to do this now, for the following reasons:

  • Many devices and software can use various different protocols and modems, not just one. There are already a lot of different methods used (APRS, DMR, various HF modes).
  • If we'd tag software X (running on a computer or mobile phone) as capable of doing APRS, LoRa and DPRS in this database, it would not communicate which protocol is being used at the moment. I presume one of your goals would be to filter stations based on the protocol, but this criteria would not work well for that when multiprotocol devices are out there.
  • Maybe the igates should be tagging themselves somehow, signaling that stations which were received by this igate callsign-SSID were on protocol Y.
  • Adding more details to the database will increase the amount of changes and updates, increasing the effort required to maintain it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants