Use native implementation to optimize object derived address computation

[igor-aptos]

Description

Computing address for primary_fungible_asset store is expensive, and repeated multiple times. (especially if we start using fungible assets for gas charging)

This optimizes that computation by moving it to rust, and by caching it within a transaction (so computation in prologue gets saved for epilogue)

Type of Change

• Performance improvement

Which Components or Systems Does This Change Impact?

• Aptos Framework

How Has This Been Tested?

added unit test
performance on Coin => FA migration

Checklist

• I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I identified and added all stakeholders and component owners affected by this change as reviewers
• I tested both happy and unhappy path of the functionality
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

[trunk-io]

⏱️ 1h 46m total CI duration on this PR

Job	Cumulative Duration	Recent Runs
rust-unit-tests	49m	🟥 🟥
rust-move-unit-coverage	24m	🟩 🟥
rust-lints	11m	🟩 🟩
run-tests-main-branch	10m	🟩 🟩
general-lints	4m	🟩 🟩
check-dynamic-deps	4m	🟩 🟩
semgrep/ci	1m	🟩 🟩
file_change_determinator	36s	🟩 🟩
file_change_determinator	31s	🟩 🟩
file_change_determinator	30s	🟩 🟩
permission-check	10s	🟩 🟩
permission-check	10s	🟩 🟩
rust-move-tests	8s	🟩 🟩
permission-check	8s	🟩 🟩
permission-check	7s	🟩 🟩

🚨 3 jobs on the last run were significantly faster/slower than expected

Job	Duration	vs 7d avg	Delta
run-tests-main-branch	6m	4m
rust-lints	6m	7m
rust-move-tests	3s	3m

_{settings ⋅ feedback ⋅ docs ⋅ learn more about trunk.io}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.15686% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 62.3%. Comparing base (d7867f7) to head (3236e99).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...s-gas-schedule/src/gas_schedule/aptos_framework.rs	0.0%	3 Missing ⚠️
aptos-move/aptos-vm/src/move_vm_ext/vm.rs	0.0%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #12768   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    62.3%    62.3%           
=======================================
  Files         828      828           
  Lines      185791   185829   +38     
=======================================
+ Hits       115821   115855   +34     
- Misses      69970    69974    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vgao1996]

Do we have any perf data on this?

[vgao1996]

Can we make the native private?

[igor-aptos]

oh mistake

[igor-aptos]

if gas is paid from primary fungible store, prologue+epilogue gets 35% faster

[lightmark]

lgtm

[github-actions]

✅ Forge suite compat success on aptos-node-v1.10.1 ==> 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c

Compatibility test results for aptos-node-v1.10.1 ==> 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c (PR)
1. Check liveness of validators at old version: aptos-node-v1.10.1
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::liveness-check : committed: 6663 txn/s, latency: 4989 ms, (p50: 4800 ms, p90: 8400 ms, p99: 10200 ms), latency samples: 233220
2. Upgrading first Validator to new version: 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::single-validator-upgrade : committed: 1869 txn/s, latency: 15580 ms, (p50: 19300 ms, p90: 22200 ms, p99: 22600 ms), latency samples: 91620
3. Upgrading rest of first batch to new version: 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::half-validator-upgrade : committed: 1721 txn/s, latency: 16123 ms, (p50: 19100 ms, p90: 21400 ms, p99: 22300 ms), latency samples: 89500
4. upgrading second batch to new version: 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c
compatibility::simple-validator-upgrade::rest-validator-upgrade : committed: 3447 txn/s, latency: 9080 ms, (p50: 9900 ms, p90: 12300 ms, p99: 12600 ms), latency samples: 137900
5. check swarm health
Compatibility test for aptos-node-v1.10.1 ==> 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c passed
Test Ok

• Grafana dashboard
• Humio Logs
• Axiom Logs
• Validator CPU Profile
• Fullnode CPU Profile
• Test runner output
• Test run is land-blocking

[github-actions]

✅ Forge suite realistic_env_max_load success on 3236e997ce1c964172a73b75fe90dc6b3a597a1c

two traffics test: inner traffic : committed: 7960 txn/s, latency: 4915 ms, (p50: 4800 ms, p90: 5700 ms, p99: 10200 ms), latency samples: 3446960
two traffics test : committed: 100 txn/s, latency: 2028 ms, (p50: 2000 ms, p90: 2200 ms, p99: 5400 ms), latency samples: 1660
Latency breakdown for phase 0: ["QsBatchToPos: max: 0.208, avg: 0.202", "QsPosToProposal: max: 0.282, avg: 0.217", "ConsensusProposalToOrdered: max: 0.478, avg: 0.396", "ConsensusOrderedToCommit: max: 0.407, avg: 0.382", "ConsensusProposalToCommit: max: 0.793, avg: 0.778"]
Max round gap was 1 [limit 4] at version 26495. Max no progress secs was 4.782718 [limit 15] at version 1731171.
Test Ok

• Grafana dashboard
• Humio Logs
• Axiom Logs
• Validator CPU Profile
• Fullnode CPU Profile
• Test runner output
• Test run is land-blocking