Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Split specs in integration test for operator #554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 7, 2021

Conversation

danielpacak
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pacak pacak.daniel@gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Daniel Pacak <pacak.daniel@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #554 (ea0eaf0) into main (e65f26b) will increase coverage by 0.46%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #554      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.86%   71.33%   +0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        4054     4054              
==========================================
+ Hits         2873     2892      +19     
+ Misses        862      851      -11     
+ Partials      319      311       -8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/operator/controller/ciskubebenchreport.go 67.77% <0.00%> (+1.66%) ⬆️
pkg/operator/controller/configauditreport.go 68.26% <0.00%> (+3.36%) ⬆️
pkg/operator/controller/vulnerabilityreport.go 71.60% <0.00%> (+3.70%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e65f26b...ea0eaf0. Read the comment docs.

@danielpacak danielpacak merged commit e38b345 into main May 7, 2021
@danielpacak danielpacak deleted the refactor-itest-operator-split-spec branch May 7, 2021 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant