Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize PET tracers handling (ML / DL / Stats) #137

Merged
merged 51 commits into from
Nov 3, 2020

Conversation

alexandreroutier
Copy link
Contributor

@alexandreroutier alexandreroutier commented Oct 20, 2020

Follows PR #129.

After this PR, handling of PET tracers will be the same across Clinica pipelines (acq_label / suvr_reference_region / optional use_pvc_data).

alexandreroutier and others added 27 commits October 20, 2020 15:12
get_caps_pet_list function was removed. This function is obsolete (it contained the attempt of defining an analysis-series ID abandoned in 2016-17) and is not used in Clinica. It is likely to be replaced by CAPSTSVBasedInput now.
These functions are obsolete and are replaced by CAPSInputs classes in input.py
Co-authored-by: Ninon Burgos <ninon.burgos@gmail.com>
@alexandreroutier alexandreroutier marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2020 12:21
Copy link
Contributor

@nburgos nburgos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked all the wiki pages and made modifications when needed. Should be all good now.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mdiazmel mdiazmel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @alexandreroutier,
Code readability has improved a lot with these changes!
A couple suggestions before merging.

clinica/utils/inputs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
clinica/utils/inputs.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alexandreroutier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @alexandreroutier,
Code readability has improved a lot with these changes!
A couple suggestions before merging.

Hi!

Thanks for the feedback, I addressed the comments in 022b72e :)

I think this can now be merged.

@mdiazmel
Copy link
Collaborator

mdiazmel commented Nov 3, 2020

Hi @alexandreroutier ,
I propose to do a "squash and merge" for this PR, if you're agree.

@mdiazmel mdiazmel merged commit 34b57ca into aramis-lab:dev Nov 3, 2020
@alexandreroutier alexandreroutier deleted the pet_tracers_2 branch December 9, 2020 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Documentation (wiki, source code, etc.) pipeline
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants