Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show the relationship properly in a report when inverse, re #6328 #6553

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

njkim
Copy link
Collaborator

@njkim njkim commented Aug 19, 2020

Types of changes

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Description of Change

Get related resource with the proper relationship type even when the relationship is in reverse (inverserelationshiptype), instead of getting all the resources with the forward relationship type, re #6328

Issues Solved

#6328

Checklist

  • Unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Ticket Background

  • Sponsored by:
  • Found by: @
  • Tested by: @
  • Designed by: @

Further comments

@njkim njkim requested a review from chiatt August 19, 2020 00:29
@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

azaroth42 commented Aug 20, 2020

👍

Tested and works as expected for me. Thanks @njkim !

@chiatt chiatt self-assigned this Aug 20, 2020
@chiatt chiatt linked an issue Aug 20, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
@chiatt chiatt merged commit dbc46a9 into master Aug 20, 2020
@chiatt chiatt deleted the 6328_inverse_relationship_in_report branch October 11, 2023 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Related Resources Report doesn't show correct inverse relationship
3 participants