-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing failed when reproducing experiments by processing test*.py #3
Comments
Hi @n1243645679976! Hope this helps! |
Thanks for your quick response and explanation! best, |
I am not sure about which lines you are referring to (L36 is the parser code for epochs), but one quick fix is to supply the SNR arguments but keep |
Hi @archiki, Here's the process I test the noisy dataset. My problem is :
best, |
Hey @n1243645679976 , I fixed the edit you suggested in L154 of So the answer to your question 1 is yes, it's the same model. The answer to your question 2, is difficult for me to say since I don't have access to your setup. However, I have provided the test set used as you mentioned. I would recommend you double-check your manifest files, to ensure that you have matched the audio file with the correct transcript text. You should also check if you are able to re-create the clean WER of 10.3 using the standard
I am not sure what you mean by this, there is no need for you to group anything. As long as add all the files in the Best, |
Hi @archiki, This is what happened: Thanks for your help! Best, |
Yes, the difference between the two is that under |
Hi @archiki,
I am trying to evaluate the model checkpoint you provided here by running the commands below.
The command is based on here, and the difference between the commands above is only the testing script.
All of them throw exceptions and the error messages are:
Though I can modify the files to pass these exceptions, it will take time to find the way to reproduce experiment result provided in the table...
So, my question is
test.py
is the script to reproduce the experiment result in the table?best,
Cheng-Hung Hu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: