We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apparently this syntax is legal, even though it is not documented in the MCNP6 manual:
<surface_number> KX <x> <t²> 0
The 0 at the end of the surface card means "both cone sheets" (equivalent to omitting the sheet parameter).
0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
5d98751
Add support for 0 as a cone sheet specifier
4d9eade
Closes #2.
arekfu
No branches or pull requests
Apparently this syntax is legal, even though it is not documented in the MCNP6 manual:
The
0
at the end of the surface card means "both cone sheets" (equivalent to omitting the sheet parameter).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: