Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Teleinfo use Apparent Power as Active Power approximation #19756

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

s-hadinger
Copy link
Collaborator

Description:

#19381 removed Active Power in favor of Apparent Power (which is the only information provided by Teleinfo). However this was a breaking change and Active Power is always 0.

I propose to copy Apparent Power to Active Power as an approximation (which should not be too bad).

Note: Teleinfo provides instant current as IINST, but it's an integer which is not precise enough.

@hallard Are you ok with this? Do you have a better way to get Active Power?

Checklist:

  • The pull request is done against the latest development branch
  • Only relevant files were touched
  • Only one feature/fix was added per PR and the code change compiles without warnings
  • The code change is tested and works with Tasmota core ESP8266 V.2.7.4.9
  • The code change is tested and works with Tasmota core ESP32 V.2.0.14
  • I accept the CLA.

NOTE: The code change must pass CI tests. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass

@hallard
Copy link
Contributor

hallard commented Oct 15, 2023

@s-hadinger it was also in my thought doing something like that during #19381 but was not sure of side effects so I let only one, but this one got my preference, so yes I'm ok and that's the best we can do with what we have. Some meters have TENSION label that I may use to try to have IINST more precise (divide PAPP by TENSION) but once agin it's just empiric.

@s-hadinger s-hadinger merged commit 8467b41 into arendst:development Oct 16, 2023
63 checks passed
@ouinouin
Copy link
Contributor

ouinouin commented Nov 8, 2023

hi, @hallard ,
first thanks for your great job around teleinfo.
this weird behavior of the telinfo thing in all modes to not show the active power was really a stupid thing from Enedis , they even didnt manage to go for a floating point number on amperes, which gives us a 230w step if we multiply power by voltage.

Despite that, would disagree to make the assumption that : active power = apparent power.
I know as customers, we dont pay for reactive power, but i think its great to show up those figures, since the assumption of apparent power = active power is very wrong is all houses i go to do some measures, reason being there is a lot of small transformers that completely disturb the current quality, add to this some "line assist" UPS or other oddities, and the power factor is often near 0,6 , 0,7.
as our times are challenging energy wise, and as some people are having more small solar at home , i think more and more people will be sensitive to the concept of apparent power, (for example to have better autonomy from a UPS, you get more bang for the bucks if your power factor is high).

as a remedial , to guess the power in watts, i do the derivation on a short time range of EAST, and manage to get some useful values, even if the derivation means the value is lagging a bit behind.
Wh/time = W :-)

otherwise on mode standard, you have the 30 min averaged : Puissance Active Soutirée and Linky Puissance Active Soutirée N-1 that could be another solution (maybe in fact choosing the method should be an option.)

thanks again for all the job around opensource and teleinfo if only @enedis had a look at the job done here and could push an upgrade on their protocol...
tell us what you think if you have time , i m curious to have your opinion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants