This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
Raise error for duplicate application names #69
Merged
xianlubird
merged 3 commits into
argoproj:master
from
jopit:duplicate-application-error
Dec 18, 2020
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be part of the
generateApplications
, if there is a duplicate name the generate will fail with an error. what do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's cleaner if the validation is done separately from the generation, particularly in light of Jonathan's comments above about the reconcile being retried when there is an error. If validation is separate, an error from
generateApplications
will still result in the reconcile being retried, while a duplicate application name will not.Also, if there is a problem generating one of the applications,
generateApplications
currently will return both an error and a slice containing the valid applications (I'm not sure why). I think weaving the return of an error for duplicate names into this logic would be unnecessarily complicated.