New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: defaulting to in-cluster is misleading for disconnected clusters #10132
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Remington Breeze <remington@breeze.software>
Codecov ReportBase: 45.62% // Head: 45.62% // No change to project coverage 👍
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #10132 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 45.62% 45.62%
=======================================
Files 236 236
Lines 28699 28699
=======================================
Hits 13093 13093
Misses 13805 13805
Partials 1801 1801
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
Maybe this is a dumb question but will it have any impact of not showing the in-cluster cluster correctly (e.g. showing them as Unknown)? |
Not a dumb question at all, I'll have to double check to make sure that's not the case. Thanks for catching that. It appears the local cluster is explicitly named Line 28 in c1d8173
which would lead me to believe this |
@rbreeze did you have a chance to test? Would be happy to review. |
@crenshaw-dev tested! |
Signed-off-by: Remington Breeze remington@breeze.software
Note on DCO:
If the DCO action in the integration test fails, one or more of your commits are not signed off. Please click on the Details link next to the DCO action for instructions on how to resolve this.
Checklist: