Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change Command line options to AmigaDOS style #18

Closed
bubbob42 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Change Command line options to AmigaDOS style #18

bubbob42 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bubbob42
Copy link

bubbob42 commented Jan 15, 2024

Thank you for the update!

Regarding the „-g“ option for CLI — that’s unix CLI style. For AmigaDOS, one should parse arguments using ReadArgs(). In this case, the template would be e.g. :

G=GUI/S

And would be called with

Mnemosyne gui

or just

Mnemosyne g

Check out Autodocs for dos/ReadArgs()

@Arisamiga Arisamiga self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
@Arisamiga Arisamiga added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 15, 2024
@Arisamiga
Copy link
Owner

Arisamiga commented Jan 15, 2024

Hello! Thanks for making an issue.

The -g option was changed with the following pull request #17 and was included in the latest 1.2.0 update to use the GUI Keyword.

You should be able to do Mnemosyne GUI <path> in the latest version of Mnemosyne.

@Arisamiga Arisamiga added the Investigating Shows that this issue is currently being investigated label Jan 15, 2024
@bubbob42
Copy link
Author

Ahhh... I was confused by the Wiki-documentation, which still shows "-g" option. Thanks!

@Arisamiga Arisamiga removed the Investigating Shows that this issue is currently being investigated label Jan 15, 2024
@Arisamiga
Copy link
Owner

Ahhh... I was confused by the Wiki-documentation, which still shows "-g" option. Thanks!

Oh, I forgot to change that. Thanks for letting me know! (It should be changed now)

I will be closing this issue as it is resolved! If you have any further issues don't hesitate to reopen it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants