fix(anta.tests): Updated testcase to support more address family #566
Conversation
anta/tests/routing/bgp.py
Outdated
| @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ def validate_inputs(self: BaseModel) -> BaseModel: | |||
| """ | |||
| Validate the inputs provided to the BgpAfi class. | |||
|
|
|||
| If afi is either ipv4 or ipv6, safi must be provided. | |||
| If afi is ipv4, ipv6 or sr-te, safi must be provided. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
missed to update, will update back in next commit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes please update this. Also, can we add a note somewhere maybe in the docstring of the test class explaining the different syntax for sr-te?
anta/tests/routing/bgp.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| # Swaping AFI and SAFI in case of SR-TE address family | ||
| if afi == "sr-te": | ||
| afi, safi = safi, afi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should put that in the render function no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes we are doing this in render function too in the line (https://github.com/arista-netdevops-community/anta/pull/566/files#:~:text=%23%20For%20SR%2DTE,.vrf)))
Reason of here again to change is to get correct afi and safi in failure. If we dont swap then for SR-TE in failure we get afi as sr-te but expected is ipv4 and safi as sr-te.
Failures: [{'afi': 'sr-te', 'safi': 'ipv4', 'vrfs': {'default': {'10.255.0.2': {'peerState': 'Connect', 'inMsgQueue': 0, 'outMsgQueue': 0}}}}]
|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
|
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
carl-baillargeon
merged commit 965a111
into
arista-netdevops-community:main
| @@ -218,8 +220,12 @@ def render(self, template: AntaTemplate) -> list[AntaCommand]: | |||
| """Render the template for each BGP address family in the input list.""" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe this is a docstring that deserves more info given the "dark magic" in the rendering function
| @@ -286,7 +298,7 @@ class Input(AntaTest.Input): | |||
| """List of BGP address families (BgpAfi).""" | |||
|
|
|||
| class BgpAfi(BaseModel): | |||
| """Model for a BGP address family (AFI) and subsequent service family (SAFI).""" | |||
| """Model for a BGP address family (AFI) and subsequent address family (SAFI).""" | |||
|
|
|||
| afi: Afi | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we work to avoid the duplication of BgpAfi in every test?
Description
Updated VerifyBGPPeerCount, VerifyBGPPeersHealth and VerifyBGPSpecificPeers test to support more address families
Fixes #565
Checklist:
pre-commit run)tox -e testenv)