Feat(eos_designs): Implement WAN/LAN redistribution for eBGP LAN

[gmuloc]

Change Summary

• aligned node types underlay protocols in node_type_keys and underlay_routing_protocol
• changed default underlay_routing_protocol of wan_xx router
• updated
• Added FLOW tracking on uplinks for cv-pathfinder
• Removed IPSec IKE profile to be generated for dataplane profile (will need to add it back in HA case, or rather, whenever there is a static peer configured in WAN case to be more generic in the mechanism)

Component(s) name

arista.avd.eos_designs

Proposed changes

NOTE: The behavior below is for WAN router

• Mark all locally learned route on the router with the SoO extended community
• Configure BGP route-map out towards underlay peers (LAN side) to advertise SoO marked routes (learned locally) and WAN routes (using AS-PATH)
• Configure BGP route-map in from underlay peers (LAN side) to deny WAN routes (potentially learned from another router connected on the WAN) and to mark the prefixes received from the LAN with the SoO
• configured the route-map conn-2-bgp to set the SoO on redistributed routes
• Changed the EVPN-EXPORT-VRF-DEFAULT route-map to match on the SoO to decide what to send over EVPN in VRF default

How to test

molecule

Checklist

User Checklist

• Also support AutoVPN edges
• Test in a small lab setup to verify redistribution
• Update documentation

Repository Checklist

• My code has been rebased from devel before I start
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation and documentation have been updated accordingly.
• I have updated molecule CI testing accordingly. (check the box if not applicable)

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

[gmuloc]

Tested with current SoO usage in Lab and it works

[gmuloc]

@ClausHolbechArista for the last commit 7807e3d it feels like we are missing some filtering on static routes (as we would not want the ones coming from WAN to be advertised, but we would want the one coming from tenant)