-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Pulsar Scheduler] Don't Schedule Jobs When Executors Are Lagging Behind #2308
Conversation
…ma/pulsar-scheduler-out-of-sync
Is this good to review? I made a minor change to the unit test as it was failing - but looks like it was just a copy paste error |
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2308 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.97% 58.98% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 225 225
Lines 28470 28498 +28
==========================================
+ Hits 16790 16810 +20
- Misses 10388 10394 +6
- Partials 1292 1294 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@JamesMurkin yup I think this one is god to review |
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ scheduling: | |||
memory: 1.0 | |||
cpu: 1.0 | |||
maximumJobsToSchedule: 5000 | |||
maxUnacknowledgedJobsPerExecutor: 2500 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possibly we should re-adjust numbers in config.
We allow scheduling 5000 per round, but only allow 2500 lag - which can easily happen in a single round
Possibly maximumJobsToSchedule should be 1000 instead
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito