Running the Test Suite #103
Comments
|
Thank you! The Lua test suite is not included in this project, as it is a PR on the "official" Lua test suite, as some test cannot run on golua. The PR is here: arnodel/golua-tests#3 Clone it and run Does that address your issue? |
|
Ah, it's a separate repository! The documentation made it seem I ran that command in this repository. Any idea when that PR will be merged? Also, what's with changing the test cases? I checked some files and it seems fine, not any cheating going on. My whole point with this was to just run golua with the latest Lua test cases to see how well it performs. This project having everything in Go AND including a way to run the official Lua testsuite is quite fantastic if you ask me. It's a very good way to make sure golua works with Lua files. It's a very good indicator of how robust this project is. |
|
I assume I can't just use the Lua files from lua-5.4.6-tests.tar.gz as is to test against the latest? It would be nice if it worked that way. |
|
No, it's not possible because some tests are specific to the C
implementation.
Sadly I don't have time to work on this right now.
…On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, 00:27 Chillance, ***@***.***> wrote:
I assume I can't just use the Lua files from lua-5.4.6-tests.tar.gz as is
to test against the latest? It would be nice if it worked that way.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#103 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMJKOKAXMM45R43B2WDEELYVZ2WRAVCNFSM6AAAAABD47Z53OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZQGE3DANJSG4>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
So, what's left to do in the PR? |
|
The PR is there to show the difference with the original test suite. It
should not be merged!
…On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, 20:05 Chillance, ***@***.***> wrote:
So, what's left to do in the PR?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#103 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMJKOLBNTAHPGLDWE4BYSDYV6EZPAVCNFSM6AAAAABD47Z53OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZRHA3TAMRSGU>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
But what can be done is adding the latest version of the test to the main
branch, and merging that into the PR, then checking if golua still passes
the tests in the PR branch.
…On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, 21:21 Arnaud Delobelle, ***@***.***> wrote:
The PR is there to show the difference with the original test suite. It
should not be merged!
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, 20:05 Chillance, ***@***.***> wrote:
> So, what's left to do in the PR?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#103 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMJKOLBNTAHPGLDWE4BYSDYV6EZPAVCNFSM6AAAAABD47Z53OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZRHA3TAMRSGU>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
|
So, I started to with the golua5.4 branch and adding files from the 5.4.6 lua test suite updating files like you did with commenting out things that weren't supported or otherwise. However, I didn't come far until there were issues. calls.lua: which is this: and commenting that out and doing other changes you did I came to the coroutine.lua which hangs at: So yeah, I think this is a bit too much for me to go through as I'm not familiar with golua. |
|
Thank you for trying it, I appreciate it! I will look at it when I can, but
it might not be for a little while, unfortunately.
…On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, 06:18 Chillance, ***@***.***> wrote:
So, I started to with the golua5.4 branch and adding files from the 5.4.6
lua test suite updating files like you did with commenting out things that
weren't supported or otherwise. However, I didn't come far until there were
issues.
calls.lua:
k:1:1: invalid token: illegal character near '\27'
in function assert (file [Go])
in function <main chunk> (file calls.lua:355)
which is this:
do -- another bug (since 5.2)
-- corrupted binary dump: list of upvalue names is larger than number
-- of upvalues, overflowing the array of upvalues.
local code =
"\x1b\x4c\x75\x61\x54\x00\x19\x93\x0d\x0a\x1a\x0a\x04\x08\x08\x78\x56\z
\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x28\x77\x40\x00\x86\x40\z
\x74\x65\x6d\x70\x81\x81\x01\x00\x02\x82\x48\x00\x02\x00\xc7\x00\x01\z
\x00\x80\x80\x80\x82\x00\x00\x80\x81\x82\x78\x80\x82\x81\x86\x40\x74\z
\x65\x6d\x70"
assert(load(code)) -- segfaults in previous versions
end
and commenting that out and doing other changes you did I came to the
coroutine.lua which hangs at:
to-be-closed variables in coroutines
testing 'coroutine.close'
So yeah, I think this is a bit too much for me to go through as I'm not
familiar with golua.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#103 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMJKOOI3ETMFNXIN6I5B5TYWFVL7AVCNFSM6AAAAABD47Z53OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZUGM4DEMRVGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
This is nice project!
I wanted to test running the test suite to see all is OK and then also to test with the latest 5.4.6. However, I'm not sure how to do that. Documentation say to run golua -u -e "_U=true" all.lua but there is no all.lua file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: