[BUG] Wrong Option deserialization

[herulume]

Describe the bug

Option<T> de-serializes to it's internal representation (when T is present and when it's not) .

To Reproduce

Run this adapted example

import arrow.core.Option
import arrow.core.none
import arrow.core.some
import arrow.integrations.jackson.module.registerArrowModule
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonInclude
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.registerKotlinModule
import io.kotest.core.spec.style.FunSpec
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldBe

class ExampleTest :
    FunSpec(
        {

            data class Organization(
                val name: String,
                val address: Option<String>,
                val email: Option<String>
            )

            val mapper = ObjectMapper().registerKotlinModule()
                .registerArrowModule()
                .setSerializationInclusion(
                    JsonInclude.Include.NON_ABSENT
                ) // will not serialize None as nulls

            val prettyPrinter = mapper.writerWithDefaultPrettyPrinter()

            test("example #1: data structure serialization") {
                val arrowKt = Organization("arrow-kt", none(), "foo@barr".some())

                val jsonString = prettyPrinter.writeValueAsString(arrowKt)

                jsonString shouldBe """
      {
        "name" : "arrow-kt",
        "email" : "foo@bar"
      }
    """.trimIndent()

                mapper.readValue(jsonString, Organization::class.java) shouldBe arrowKt
            }
        })

Expected behavior

• When T is present, de-serialize to it's value.
• When T isn't present, not show the field (according to the configuration)

Screenshots

Environment (please complete the following information):

• Kotlin version: 1.6.21
• Kotlin Intellij IDEA plugin version: 222-1.7.21-release-272-IJ4167.29
• Intellij IDEA version: 17.0.4.1+7-b469.62 aarch64

Additional context
This problem appear with an Option of a value class but I was able to reproduce it with an Option<String> as per the example.

[myuwono]

@herulume thanks for reporting this 🙌 What was the version of arrow and arrow-integrations that were used? I struggle to replicate the problem in latest. Would you mind trying this with 0.13.3-alpha.22? Sorry about the alpha version. Arrow team is currently in the process to release this library. I'll poke the team again just to be sure.

Here is the branch with the identical test, which seemingly has the expected behaviour
https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow-integrations/pull/106/files

[myuwono]

We've just released 0.14.0 which is of the same code as 0.13.3-alpha.22. @herulume can we try against that and see if the problem persists?

[herulume]

Hey!
Thank you for such a fast answer. It is indeed solved now 🙏