Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make ApplicativeError#catch have bias to the right #1063

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 23, 2018

Conversation

pakoito
Copy link
Member

@pakoito pakoito commented Oct 23, 2018

It makes sense with our right-bias policy, and the lambda sugar makes more sense in the operation rather than the transformation.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2018

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@c3a2836). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1063   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   42.65%           
  Complexity        ?      737           
=========================================
  Files             ?      354           
  Lines             ?     9787           
  Branches          ?     1061           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     4175           
  Misses            ?     5298           
  Partials          ?      314
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../main/kotlin/arrow/typeclasses/ApplicativeError.kt 90% <100%> (ø) 0 <0> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c3a2836...8a980c6. Read the comment docs.

@pakoito pakoito merged commit da9b48a into master Oct 23, 2018
@pakoito pakoito deleted the paco-catchrightbias branch October 23, 2018 22:39
@raulraja raulraja mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants