Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

receiver-constrained example function should be renamed #2282

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 3, 2021

Conversation

clojj
Copy link
Contributor

@clojj clojj commented Mar 2, 2021

as in: the resulting user has been processed by this function

@clojj clojj changed the title receiver-constrained example function should be named better receiver-constrained example function should be renamed Mar 2, 2021
@rachelcarmena rachelcarmena merged commit 46a1771 into arrow-kt:master Mar 3, 2021
i-walker pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
* CU-f148by Update to error handling tutorial (#2273)

* Setup changes for 0.13

* Removes outdated projects and examples section

* Update to error handling tutorial pending of fixing Ank output for results

* Review commets

* combined example fun should be named in past tense (as in: the resulting user _has been processed_) (#2282)

* Fix ReplaceWith (#2286)

Co-authored-by: Raúl Raja Martínez <raulraja@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: clojj <clojj@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants