Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Prevent configuration with multiple inputs of the same type #5

Open
arthurrump opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Prevent configuration with multiple inputs of the same type #5

arthurrump opened this issue Oct 1, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@arthurrump
Copy link
Owner

I'm not sure how this could be accomplished in the schema, but it would be helpful to prevent having both a t_set_number and a t_set_output, because behaviour in that case is undefined and an update to one does not change the value in the other. (That wouldn't make sense: there is no way in which an output can report back.)

Right now this will likely result in a warning about duplicate defines, which is something but not great. This should be validated at the Python stage if at all possible.
@arthurrump arthurrump added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 1, 2022
cadavre pushed a commit to cadavre/esphome-opentherm that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2024
@PxPert
Add sm_active and dhw_block Switches (arthurrump#5)
b89544e 
* Add sm_active (Summer Mode) and dhw_block (Domestic hot Water blocking) Switches

* Update README.md with new switches

---------

Co-authored-by: PxPert <pxpert@pxpert.cloud>
cadavre pushed a commit to cadavre/esphome-opentherm that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2024
Revert "Add sm_active and dhw_block Switches (arthurrump#5)"
3a0742b 
This reverts commit b89544e.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@arthurrump