Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
@chringwer yes, we're definitely going to add support for those! we just need to do it in a way that's fully backwards-compatible as there's a lot of code out there relying on current behavior. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Are there plans to support ES6 modules as processors or plugins for artillery? If we would use
await import()
instead ofrequire()
, I think that should work for both commonjs as well as modules. Of course that means we would need to deal with the asynchronicity here but that should be feasible. At least that's much less hassle than dealing with the async imports inside the processor function when dealing with a codebase that has migrated totype: "module"
.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions