Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rubocop from 0.47.1 to 0.60.0 #28

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2018
Merged

Conversation

dleve123
Copy link
Contributor

@dleve123 dleve123 commented Nov 6, 2018

  • Addresses CVE-2017-8418
  • Re-generates .rubocop_todo.yml to skip failing style validations

@peril-staging
Copy link

peril-staging bot commented Nov 6, 2018

Danger run resulted in 2 warnings; to find out more, see the checks page.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

@ArtsyOpenSource
Copy link

ArtsyOpenSource commented Nov 6, 2018

1 Warning
⚠️ Unless you’re refactoring existing code, please update CHANGELOG.md.

Here's an example of a CHANGELOG.md entry:

* [#28](https://github.com/artsy/estella/pull/28): Update rubocop from 0.47.1 to 0.60.0 - [@dleve123](https://github.com/dleve123).

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@cavvia
Copy link
Contributor

cavvia commented Nov 8, 2018

Interesting build failure - looks like it's related to Elasticsearch API updates. We probably need to freeze the elasticsearch-model library version or update our specs to conform with ES 6.1 API specifications.

Copy link
Contributor

@dblock dblock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you run “rubocop -a”? I would do that before generating new configuration.

* run a `rubocop -a` and commit all automatically generated style
changes
* elasticsearch-models's 2.X series supports Elasticsearch 2.X.
  + See [elasticsearch-model's README][0] for more info

[0]:https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-rails/tree/4429fd9c27b4808a721e90481fd8814a0b7486d4/elasticsearch-model#compatibility
@dleve123 dleve123 requested a review from cavvia November 13, 2018 15:45
@dleve123
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dblock @cavvia – this PR should be good to go. There's no meaningful diff to the project, so I'm not sure what Coveralls is complaining about. LMK if there's anything else needed to get this merged.

FWIW: rubocop is a development dependency, so there is no additional upstream systems that need to get patched here.

@dblock dblock merged commit 349e08c into artsy:master Nov 14, 2018
@dblock
Copy link
Contributor

dblock commented Nov 14, 2018

Merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants