Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore InstanceOfCheckForException by default for tests. #1424

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2019
Merged

Ignore InstanceOfCheckForException by default for tests. #1424

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2019

Conversation

vanniktech
Copy link
Contributor

Should be fine to use while testing and asserting that we've got a certain exception.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1424 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #1424   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     74.14%   74.14%           
  Complexity     1930     1930           
=========================================
  Files           324      324           
  Lines          5105     5105           
  Branches        945      945           
=========================================
  Hits           3785     3785           
  Misses          770      770           
  Partials        550      550
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...ekt/generator/printer/rulesetpage/ConfigPrinter.kt 83.33% <ø> (ø) 10 <0> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eda9f86...dd99734. Read the comment docs.

@arturbosch arturbosch merged commit 7b5b3ec into detekt:master Jan 18, 2019
@arturbosch arturbosch added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jan 18, 2019
@vanniktech vanniktech deleted the InstanceOfCheckForException branch January 18, 2019 09:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants