Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add faster Laplace #356

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

Add faster Laplace #356

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

rohanbabbar04
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Add class Laplace with all methods.
  • Update test in test_scipy.py.

Checklist

  • Code style is correct (follows pylint and black guidelines)
  • Includes new or updated tests to cover the new feature
  • New features are properly documented (with an example if required)

preliz/distributions/laplace.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
preliz/distributions/laplace.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 82.55814% with 15 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.75%. Comparing base (c521038) to head (40acba7).

Files Patch % Lines
preliz/distributions/laplace.py 82.35% 15 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #356      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.83%   82.75%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          51       52       +1     
  Lines        5099     5154      +55     
==========================================
+ Hits         4224     4265      +41     
- Misses        875      889      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aloctavodia aloctavodia merged commit 2e7aade into arviz-devs:main Mar 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@rohanbabbar04 rohanbabbar04 deleted the laplace branch March 15, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants