-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
define the metric of success #2
Comments
I just found this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Kirkpatrick The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model are as follows: Reaction - what participants thought and felt about the training (satisfaction; "smile sheets") Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge and/or skills, and change in attitudes. This evaluation occurs during the training in the form of either a knowledge demonstration or test. Behavior - transfer of knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes from classroom to the job (change in job behavior due to training program). This evaluation occurs 3–6 months post training while the trainee is performing the job. Evaluation usually occurs through observation. Results - the final results that occurred because of attendance and participation in a training program (can be monetary, performance-based, etc.) |
When it goes to writing a paper,
In short, the evaluation of success often comes from outsider instead of yourself. Probably, the end goal is to put together a tool. Once you feed in the paper, this tool can help you judge the extent of progresses. |
How to evaluate if this tutorial is effective ? Should you have some (incremental) tests to check if readers grasp the key concepts and skills ? Or a reader shows he/she publishes a paper (judging by end results)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: