You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the paper you index beta and delta with negative indices for pre-treatment periods, and with positive indices for post-treatment periods. So, when constructing Delta^{SD}(M) for example, which includes expressions with delta_{t-1}, and delta_{t+1}, what is the convention for indices that are not defined? ie, how do I interpret expressions like delta_0, delta_(upperT+1), or delta_{lowerT-1}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The number of pre-periods (lowerT) and number of post-periods (upperT) are given by the user/application. So, in Section 2.4 of the draft, we define delta = (deltapre, deltapost) with delta_0 normalized to zero.
In the paper you index beta and delta with negative indices for pre-treatment periods, and with positive indices for post-treatment periods. So, when constructing Delta^{SD}(M) for example, which includes expressions with delta_{t-1}, and delta_{t+1}, what is the convention for indices that are not defined? ie, how do I interpret expressions like delta_0, delta_(upperT+1), or delta_{lowerT-1}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: