Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What's the convention for indices that are not specified? #12

Closed
amrods opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

What's the convention for indices that are not specified? #12

amrods opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@amrods
Copy link

amrods commented May 3, 2022

In the paper you index beta and delta with negative indices for pre-treatment periods, and with positive indices for post-treatment periods. So, when constructing Delta^{SD}(M) for example, which includes expressions with delta_{t-1}, and delta_{t+1}, what is the convention for indices that are not defined? ie, how do I interpret expressions like delta_0, delta_(upperT+1), or delta_{lowerT-1}?

@asheshrambachan
Copy link
Owner

The number of pre-periods (lowerT) and number of post-periods (upperT) are given by the user/application. So, in Section 2.4 of the draft, we define delta = (deltapre, deltapost) with delta_0 normalized to zero.

@amrods
Copy link
Author

amrods commented May 4, 2022

I'm just skipping restrictions that involve periods outside [lowerT, upperT].

@amrods amrods closed this as completed May 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants