Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The evaluation of referring expression #18

Closed
Jiang15 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

The evaluation of referring expression #18

Jiang15 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@Jiang15
Copy link

Jiang15 commented Jul 17, 2021

Hi,

I followed the instruction of evaluation for referring expression on COCO dataset train2014. But when I passed the args for test "!python run_with_submitit.py --dataset_config configs/refcoco.json --batch_size 4 --resume https://zenodo.org/record/4721981/files/refcoco_resnet101_checkpoint.pth --ngpus 1 --nodes 1 --ema --test --test_type testA", I didn't get any result of precision or recall, only:
"Start training
Training time 0:00:00
submitit INFO (2021-07-17 11:30:17,492) - Job completed successfully"

I also downloaded the coco dataset of val2014 and test2014 but I am not sure if I need to use that because it gave me error when I pass these dataset.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Best,

@alcinos
Copy link
Collaborator

alcinos commented Jul 17, 2021 via email

@Jiang15
Copy link
Author

Jiang15 commented Jul 18, 2021

Hello! Thanks for your interest in MDETR. Could you please add the --eval flag and retry? Le sam. 17 juil. 2021 à 07:48, Wei Jiang @.***> a écrit :

Hi, I followed the instruction of evaluation for referring expression on COCO dataset train2014. But when I passed the args for test "!python run_with_submitit.py --dataset_config configs/refcoco.json --batch_size 4 --resume https://zenodo.org/record/4721981/files/refcoco_resnet101_checkpoint.pth --ngpus 1 --nodes 1 --ema --test --test_type testA", I didn't get any result of precision or recall, only: "Start training Training time 0:00:00 submitit INFO (2021-07-17 11:30:17,492) - Job completed successfully" I also downloaded the coco dataset of val2014 and test2014 but I am not sure if I need to use that because it gave me error when I pass these dataset. Thanks a lot in advance! Best, — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYYC4GMCY434ZUC25A6TNTTYFU2FANCNFSM5AQ74VXQ .

Thanks a lot! Problem solved.

@Jiang15
Copy link
Author

Jiang15 commented Jul 18, 2021

Hello! Thanks for your interest in MDETR. Could you please add the --eval flag and retry? Le sam. 17 juil. 2021 à 07:48, Wei Jiang @.***> a écrit :

Hi, I followed the instruction of evaluation for referring expression on COCO dataset train2014. But when I passed the args for test "!python run_with_submitit.py --dataset_config configs/refcoco.json --batch_size 4 --resume https://zenodo.org/record/4721981/files/refcoco_resnet101_checkpoint.pth --ngpus 1 --nodes 1 --ema --test --test_type testA", I didn't get any result of precision or recall, only: "Start training Training time 0:00:00 submitit INFO (2021-07-17 11:30:17,492) - Job completed successfully" I also downloaded the coco dataset of val2014 and test2014 but I am not sure if I need to use that because it gave me error when I pass these dataset. Thanks a lot in advance! Best, — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#18>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYYC4GMCY434ZUC25A6TNTTYFU2FANCNFSM5AQ74VXQ .

May I ask if you split the train2014 training dataset into train, val and test? Because I saw only the train2014 is downloaded but not val2014 and test2014 for evaluation.

@ashkamath
Copy link
Owner

ashkamath commented Jul 18, 2021 via email

@Jiang15
Copy link
Author

Jiang15 commented Jul 18, 2021

train val and test all taken from the train split of coco 2014 (we did not design these splits). But we did have to be careful while constructing our pre training dataset to avoid this overlap.

Great. Thanks for answering!

@Jiang15 Jiang15 closed this as completed Jul 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants