-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Conversation
cc @anurse |
@@ -173,6 +171,7 @@ Microsoft.Extensions.TaskCache.Sources,noship,exclude | |||
Microsoft.Extensions.TypeNameHelper.Sources,noship,exclude | |||
Microsoft.Extensions.WebEncoders,ship,include | |||
Microsoft.Extensions.WebEncoders.Sources,noship,exclude | |||
Microsoft.Extensions.WebSockets.Internal,noship,exclude |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this package listed twice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nvm I misread
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noship?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a package with .Internal
. We really shouldn't be publishing it to nuget.org
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have another .Internal package that ships I believe. I'd like @anurse to comment because he knows the latest on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It needs to ship along with SignalR, so it needs to be 'ship'. It's .Internal
to indicate that it is not currently supported on it's own. It's only "supported" via using SignalR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats what I thought
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By ship, we mean publish to nuget.org when 1.2.0 comes out. Does that sound right? If so, can we come up with a better name for this or make it a .Sources
package?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, publish at 1.2.0. The big reason for the name is that we are already shipping a Microsoft.Extensions.WebSockets, so we'll have to merge the two when we actually come to ship it. I guess we could make it a sources package, or just pull the source in and not ship the package if @davidfowl 's cool with that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filed aspnet/SignalR#24 to track a better Id for those packages and \ or an alternate solution. I'll leave them as noship for now
bump. Need to get this in to unblock dev |
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.IISIntegration,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.IntegrationTesting,noship,exclude | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Https,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.WebListener,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Session,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Messaging,noship,exclude | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.SignalR.Redis,noship,exclude |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be changed to ship
@@ -77,22 +77,20 @@ Microsoft.AspNetCore.Rewrite,ship,include | |||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing,ship,include | |||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing.Abstractions,ship,include | |||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing.DecisionTree.Sources,noship,exclude | |||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Sockets,noship,exclude |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also ship
016628b
to
b39f07a
Compare
🆙 :date |
Microsoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.TestHost,ship,exclude | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Testing,noship,exclude | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.WebSockets,ship,include | ||
Microsoft.AspNetCore.WebSockets.Internal,noship,exclude |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ship
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought we were planning on renaming these first: aspnet/SignalR#24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this affect anything right now? If not that's fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope. Just makes sure we don't ignore the work item :)
cc @muratg \ @anurse