Add keep-alive timeout parameter

[benaadams]

No description provided.

[muratg]

Yeah, I think we should do this.

cc @lodejard

[muratg]

@benaadams It looks like you're working on this. Looking forward to see the PR!

[cesarblum]

@benaadams Are you working on this? I guess not since it's been 21 days since @muratg's comment 😄 I'll take this if no one's working on it.

[benaadams]

@CesarBS I was quite close with #485 though it needs rebasing; I can finish it of with improves if you can workout #569? Haven't managed to work out what's going on there.

On our priorities, we do need the keep-alive for our production use, so will move onto this now.

[cesarblum]

@benaadams I can't look into #569 immediately, so go ahead with #485 as it is right now.

[DamianEdwards]

post RC2

[darrelmiller]

It would be nice if this could be called "ConnectionTimeout" instead of Keep-Alive timeout. IIS calls it ConnectionTimeout. By calling it Keep-Alive timeout there is an inference that is somehow related to the HTTP/1.0 extension keep-alive header and the failed attempt to resurrect it for a different purpose..

Admittedly though, Apache does call it KeepAliveTimeout

[cesarblum]

@darrelmiller It might happen #1102 😄